How to unleash the artist

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Seriy

You Boldini showed a weak artist

Wait a minute, wait a minute ...
Boldini I have not seemed weak, and nauseous.
And in this thread How to unleash the artist mainly present young artists who have nowhere to sell their belongings, and often nothing, to be frank.
And you would not be confused attitude to the world famous masters of the past participants of the forum and specific short-term situation rasterenyh artists whose every sentence cries posts the question "Where to sell?".
You are really sorry, but no trace of Boldini more drag in here, it is better to compare with Panov, this is something real and even compare the number of pictures and selling them.

[fabosch]

Сообщение от Seriy

There is no humiliation in my assessment of the bunch as a commercial painting there, but it is a commercial painting with all the consequences.

You know, there have been out in one branch of a young man from New York's heartland showed several works. That, indeed, a purely commercial product (not a hand rises to write "art"). If something, and call it the same word, somehow know that something's wrong here ...
Of course, this work (flowers) is not a beautiful masterpiece, but at the same time, I have something stops to call it a purely commercial painting, though I'm not a fan of this painting (not my). In any case, it has the undoubted merit - it is quite adequate price. There is no deception

[Peter]

Сообщение от fabosch

In any case, it has the undoubted merit - it is quite adequate price.
There is no hype

"Staff" a painting.

[fabosch]

Сообщение от Peter

Staff, "a painting.

Something I tuplyu today and probably wondered what the salt tell an anecdote, it sucks, but I can not keep: do not understand about the "staff"

[Кирилл Сызранский]

fabosch, here is a salt:

Сообщение от "Peter

There is a military generals, who decide the outcome of the battle, there are staff that are somewhere in the wings, and have a" wedding ", but all of them generals!

[Seriy]

Cyril Syzransky, the class of the painter is not an ephemeral concept.
IMHO, you understand the history of (advance) and painting with an illustrative side. This is not surprising, because you are engaged in the commercial side.
But the history of painting is the history of pigments, grounds, history of art painting techniques. Someone first applies a reception, followed by this technique include an arsenal of other painters. In general, I hardly know how to interpret Van Gogh, Monet, not looking, not knowing their equipment.
I do not know how it affects the investment component of painting, but the quality of art-it is the ownership of existing techniques and creating new ones.
 A reception in the possession of nothing ephemeral.

[Peter]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

fabosch, here is a salt:



Peter, and you feel in any rank to see?

It is understandable that you consider yourself to be "fighting", but what you own "rank" defined?

Just an artist.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Seriy; 1349901"

IMHO, you understand the history of (advance) and painting with an illustrative side. This is not surprising, because you are engaged in the commercial side.

That I'm working on "an illustrative side."
And another: What is the history of pigments, grounds, history painting techniques, tricks, "I learned when you have only just been born into the world.

Added after 2 minutes
[QUOTE="Seriy; 1349901] And in the possession of receiving nothing is ephemeral.
[/QUOTE]

In the possession of, yes, but I'm afraid it is you do not completely own methods, which, for example, owns Panov.

And that, from the possession of the methods will lead the "class artist"?

[size="1"]Added after 18 minutes[/size]

Сообщение от Peter

Just an artist.

Understandable.

You-"just an artist, and Panov," staff "artist.

[Fed]

Сообщение от "Seriy

Concerning me, I had a Russian work-for example, this (sold):

It is immediately noticeable, probably so, and sold.
Why stop on its laurels?

[Seriy]

Fed, because the artist, the emergence of themes of paintings, the process of nonlinear-invented one, now second in the same direction, then two more, but better ... Information from the outside, stirring every thought, desire to improve in some aspect of painting or test a new idea, it all leads to one side.
I did not write until he had an idea-a literary or pictorial (m e a combination of colors, character strokes, texture)
Forcing myself, I can not, will be strained - nobody wants.
Will curve back to a similar theme, will be written, no means no.
Oh, and incentives-sold it for $ 100, this is not an incentive .. even 1000 - not an incentive.

And, most importantly: the art of thought rather than a brush, and if you do think, EM create conceptual, invented things (lips merge in a lightning or the letter M, the eyes of different people in turn are the eyes of a new object, railing circling dance-image called Kiss in the subway), it is not sensible to do it in a format sovriska rather than traditional painting?