Fakes ... Fakes ...

[OlegTsi]

New surge prolific imitators. These 2 works suggested to me recently artdilery, convinced of the authorship of these fakes.

Добавлено через 15 минут
infestation is spreading ... will interfere.

Because of ethical considerations, decided to remove from the 1 st miniatures, some vital parts of the body ...

[OlegTsi]

infestation is spreading ... will interfere.

Because of ethical considerations, decided to remove from the 1 st miniatures, some vital parts of the body ...

[OlegTsi]

Under ibey nickname Matsok, people from Australia offers a wide range of Russian avant-garde

1. Goncharova
2. Forino, 1919
3. M. Andreyenko (gouache)

Price from 125 to 305 dollars.

4. Original Andreenko (oil), which inspired an Australian on Vol. sketch ...

[олег назаров]

Сообщение от OlegTsi

The cost of 125 to 305 dollars.

what NEdorAgo

[Seriy]

I looked Matsok-he and Picasso excellent reproduce, explanations and signs JM, undated. Small 23h18, with simple, one-to two colors, the price of 45-60 dollars, sells hundreds.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Seriy

I looked Matsok-he and Picasso excellent reproduce, explanations and signs JM, undated. Small 23h18, with simple, one-to two colors, the price of 45-60 dollars, sells hundreds.

But all successful "multiply"-scale only different ...

[U_Z]

Сообщение от OlegTsi

new parody Burliuk

In Burliuk this work was ?! Like Van Gogh was the first Amterdamsky . VVG - the first (always#1!)

Добавлено через 3 минуты

Сообщение от OlegTsi

a la Bogomazov

Original in the collection of B. Dudakova. This is a key work of the master. 1914

[U_Z]

Сообщение от OlegTsi

a la Bogomazov

Original in the collection of B. Dudakova. This is a key work of the master. 1914

[OlegTsi]

U_Z, Thank you for submitting the original source. And the pseudo-Burliuk and watercolor sketch of "a la Bogomazov" were made with the expectation effect: "Somewhere I saw it." "And suddenly, really eskih to work ..."
Burliuk often associated with the name of Van Gogh, he even used to call in America, because he often used the style of Van Gogh in his works, and even often copied motifs of the great Dutchman in his works. But, alas, not in this case, quoted me and you. (see photo with the ship).


The following quote photo paintings Burliuk, which was used motif with well-known work of Van Gogh.

[OlegTsi]

Approximately half a year ago I was offered a job here, with a 10-page description, which was used as the expert opinion of this work. I quote the first and last an entire half-page dissertation, Susan Moulton, a professor of art history one of the universities of California (Sonoma State University).

Professor of art history by making its study antropomorfologicheskoe obvious fakes, attributing to the bare Zinaiole Gippius in white (she did not even know the name Zenaida), even did not bother to delve into well-known monographs Al. Exter, not to mention the sales of the original stories.

When I took the job in hand immediately noticed the non-European standard size - 24 x 30 inches, which is fully standard in the United States. (60,96 x 76,2 cm). Which offered a picture dealer beat his breast, and asserted that stands solidly for the authenticity of the work and the work of the old collections, etc.

I undertook to prove the contrary. After the demonstration, the original reproductions in the book of John Boult (149 x 110 cm), as a dealer to contact the owner of the painting and the history of some native changed. It turned out that the collector hung author's copy of Exter, which was written in 1912. A U.S. size - because now pulled to the U.S. sub-frame. And the price proposals were, respectively, the original - 650 thousand U.S. dollars.

Had to dig deeper and do more revealing facts. This work (the original) was in the succession fund Simone Lissima - a close friend of Al. Exter. Its double-sold at Sotheby's in New York. But anyone who tampered with and the picture and signature to it but still invented the whole story to her does not take into account two facts:
1) Alexandra Exter never consented retrospectively to repeat their work (although she was asked about the close friends).
2) Work was a 2-way, on the reverse side was written theatrical composition, dating from 20-25 years.

Everyone knows why the author uses the second opposite direction of the canvas. Apparently cubistic naked disliked most Exter, and throw away or destroy it is not wanted. Especially in retrospect to repeat what most did not like.

I bring photo - 1 forgery,
2,3 - excerpts from the study of Professor Moulton
4 - original photo
5 - the second party (perhaps the primary).

After all dealer said that the job gives owners, and they will sell it at auction. Well, we should ...