Funeral Moscow

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Tov. Syzran.
Latynina, sometimes as a breccia which, as head spin for a long time to depart from the kooky dear Julia.

Its all they know, read, it (taking into account access code to Echo and the blog there) million viewers, many of her love, and already critics of Russia in bulk, any carpenter nars criticize: "Ha, she does not know carpentry do not know! "
 

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Tiutchev

In Moscow has begun demolition of the plant Bari

Demolition of the plant Bari in Moscow suspended

The Department of Cultural Heritage of Moscow declared illegal building work on analysis of the mechanical plant engineer Alexander Bary, Interfax reported. Demolition of buildings, which began on Monday, 15 November, suspended.
It is a complex of wooden buildings of late 19 th century, located at street Lenin Sloboda, Building 19, Building 5, Building 19, Building 1 and Building 19, Building 1, Building 2. The Department acknowledged the work of illegal on the grounds that the issue of demolition is not tabled in the government. During the test object revealed that work is carried out only in the building at Building 19, Building 5, which has already dismantled the roof.

At the same time Moskomnasledie note that the plant is not an object of cultural heritage. Earlier, representatives of the movement "Arhnadzor" announced the beginning of the demolition of the plant Bari, appealed to the Moskomnasledie requesting the inclusion of buildings on the list of protected sites.

In addition, to address illegal Moskomnasledie suspended work at the facility in Bryusov lane, according to the official site of the Office. In building the estate of James Bruce, assigned to a restoration and adaptation of a function of social and business center, experts from the department recorded an attempt to build with mismatched Moskomnasledie superstructure.

http://www.lenta.ru/news/2010/11/17/stop/

[Тютчев]

November 19, 2010 14:45

Confrontation in Kozikhinskiy

Opponents of the building near the Patriarch, despite the arrest, returned to keep the defense: the construction of Kozikhinskiy all night on duty, five activists in the morning they were detained at the entrance to the building site concrete hauler

Moscow. November 19. INTERFAX.RU - Opponents of the building near Patriarch's Ponds, despite the arrest by police the day before, continue to block construction of a hotel in the Small Kozikhinskiy Lane in Moscow. "Today, residents of neighboring houses and activists around 7:00 MSK was detained at the entrances to the building site next mixer. They told the driver, he is incredibly friendly. At the request of community members, he parked the concrete hauler so as not to block traffic on the street and not to create a traffic jam, - has informed "Interfax" coordinator "of the Public Coalition for Moscow Elena Tkach. However, the activists asked the driver to connect to the concrete plant, so that the machine is not idle, and could send to another construction site. "The main thing - that there was no concrete. We caught up with a concrete plant, was asked to send a car to another place. Today, a concrete plant already aware of our requests. Others also put in popularity," - she pointed out.


In the middle of the day concrete hauler left the vicinity of construction sites. "The concrete mixer was stopped in the freeze, and the plant management decided to transfer the car to another object, - has informed agency" Interfax "Weaver. In order to ensure that the concrete hauler does not return, two-car activists accompanied the truck to the Garden Ring. "Meanwhile, other public figures for secure human chain blocked the entry to and exit from the construction site. In addition, a few older activists shut down a small hole in the fence construction", - said Weaver.


According to the source, despite the arrest on Thursday of five activists of the public men were on duty at the construction site throughout the night. "People were sitting in their cars and in a nearby cafe. Residents of nearby houses, even those who do not participate in the action, occasionally bringing them coffee and sandwiches," - said Weaver. In addition, activists on Thursday night, organized collection of signatures against the demolition of historic buildings and new development near Patriarch's Ponds. List already includes over 500 names.


Recall that on the eve of the opponents of development have been delivered to the Department. Law enforcement officials justified the detention of the fact that the protest was held illegally. Among the detainees was and actress Tatyana Dogileva. She told Interfax that the police had offered to make concessions to the activists, however, agree they have failed. "My house is near the construction site, and I love him, I want to live in it. I live in the area for 25 years. I do not want to be evicted. For us there are no political forces, no money, just a little more active than other people "- said Dogileva.


"At ATS we were treated very courteously and released an hour later. We said that we will continue to protest. They nodded, saying that everyone understands," - said the coordinator of the Coalition for Public Moscow Elena Tkach, "Interfax" on Thursday night. Also, according to her knowledge, the head of "Fair Russia" Nikolay Levichev sent a request to Prosecutor General Yuri Chaika, Russia with a request to suspend the construction site and find a compromise with residents.


Interfax has no information regarding this request from other sources, as well as information from law enforcement agencies about the detention of community members.


As reported, social activists appealed to the leadership of the country to protect the Patriarch's Ponds area from demolition and construction. Addressing the activists asked to stop construction hotels in the Small Kozikhinskiy lane change project, reducing the number of storeys and abandoning the underground garages, as well as to recreate the demolished building in this place mid-19 th century. Residents offer to reconsider the decision to demolish in the Patriarch's Ponds historic buildings and the construction of five multi-storey buildings in Greater Kozikhinskiy lane on Spiridonovka and Sytinskaya impasse.


Developer planned to erect a seven-lane Kozikhinskiy Small hotel with two underground parking.


The conflict between developers and local residents runs from mid-October.


/Interfax /

http://www.interfax.ru/society/txt.asp?id=165602

[Тютчев]

November 20, 2010 23:22

Opponents of development near Patriarch's Ponds awarded administrative arrests and fines

Moscow. November 20. Interfax - Residents of the Patriarch's Ponds, arrested this morning on the campaign against the construction of the Small Kozikhinskiy lane punished by administrative arrests and fines.

"Two of the detained men were sentenced to two days of administrative arrest, and Helen Weaver (coordinator of the Public Coalition

defense of Moscow "- IF) will have to pay a fine," - told Interfax "one of the activists' public coalition in defense of Moscow on Saturday.

She noted that at the sitting of the court initially refused to let witnesses detention.

"We started calling in the media, a scandal just before the closed doors. In the end, we have heard, but our evidence does not even enter into the business" - a spokesman said.

On Saturday morning, three activists of the coalition were arrested for "disobeying the police." They obstructed the passage to the construction Concrete truck.

The conflict between developers and local residents runs from mid-October.

Developer plans to build a seven-lane Kozikhinskiy Small hotel with two underground parking. Customer building a studio "TRITE, led by head of the Russian Cinematographers' Union, a famous film director Nikita Mikhalkov.

Social activists appealed to the leadership of the country to protect the Patriarch's Ponds area from demolition and construction.

Addressing the activists asked to stop construction hotels in the Small Kozikhinskiy lane change project, reducing the number of storeys and abandoning the underground garages, as well as to recreate the demolished building in this place mid-19 th century. Residents offer to reconsider the decision to demolish in the Patriarch's Ponds historic buildings and the construction of five multi-storey buildings in Greater Kozikhinskiy lane on Spiridonovka and Sytinskaya impasse.

http://www.interfax.ru/news.asp?id=165815

[Игорь Гурьев]

Meadow a beautiful new building to Moscow, and did not understand him.


Nest is a prophet in his own country.

[Тютчев]

Gradozaschitniki require the Attorney General to stop the illegal building of a cemetery in Malaya Okhta Bank "Saint Petersburg»

2010-11-19 11:00
 
Gradozaschitniki Petersburg asked the Russian Prosecutor General Yuri Chaika, the requirement to intervene and stop the illegal building of historical Malookhtinsky Orthodox cemetery and surrounding areas. Recall that the Bank "Saint Petersburg", despite massive public protests, started building the former Orthodox cemetery in Malaya Okhta, where lie the remains of many prominent St. Petersburg, including figures of literature, art, and so on.

"Banking structure known for its close ties with the city's executive authorities and their immediate family, is building a huge business and residential area just on the bones of our countrymen. As is evident from the workers and the local priests, during the construction process has been found many human remains, but these facts are carefully concealed builder. Found the bones were secretly removed by one of the city dumps "- said team leader Alex ERA Yarema.

As noted by Yarema, in addition to building the cemetery project of Bank Saint Petersburg "involves the illegal demolition of two valuable historical buildings - the number 49 and 55 on Malookhtinsky Avenue. "Particularly alarming is gradozaschitnikov forthcoming destruction of the house number 55, - Yarema said. - It is very beautiful, ornate, historic building in the style of "high eclecticism", designed by architect Nicholas Vitashevskogo in 1902. Such houses in the city there are very few. Will be very sorry to lose him! ".

Activists of the ERA (a specialized group of environmental common architecture) pay attention to the General Prosecutor of Russia on the fact that during the project bank "Dortmund" grossly violated the Russian federal laws on burial and funeral business "and" On protection of cultural heritage. "

Note that on Malookhtinsky Orthodox cemetery were buried writer Nikolai Pomyalovsky (later his remains were moved to the catwalk Literatorskie Volkov cemetery, but the family grave where lie the mother of the writer, stayed here), Baron George Rosen - writer, author of the opera "Life for the Tsar" (his statue is moved to the Necropolis of Artists, but without transferring the ashes), marine painter Alexey Bogolyubov (in the necropolis of artists he put cenotaph, but burial is not tolerated) and many other prominent St. Petersburg. The cemetery was destroyed in 1938 at the height of Stalinist repression.

IA ICD »

http://www.ikd.ru/node/15178

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Tatiana Dogileva:
 Yes, I am not an angel and not a fighter. But ... was scared to live in the country Russia.

This is my first experience of private resistance. Lawlessness mafia structures fused with the money of unknown origin, rolls over. I have never been friends with any authorities or the rich. She lived alone and did not want to speak out against Nikita Mikhalkov. Was acquainted with him in his youth, but admiration, he did not call. I well remember those days - it was beautiful, generous, cheerful, bryzzhuschy talented people. But when people called and asked to go to the construction site, which destroys their homes, I emerged. In my eyes at the root destroys my district - as if we, the people there.
Fully here.

[Тютчев]

From Winckelmann to Erdogan

Sergei Ageev, architect, coordinator of "Arhnadzor».
 
The State Duma is preparing to adopt the amendments to the law on cultural heritage sites that allow the reconstruction of architectural monuments. With the adoption of amendments to the current practice of replacing historic homes remakes will be institutionalized
 

Construction stopped on Borovitskaya area, rejected the draft floor courtyard commissariat stores, suspended construction of a new hall of Helikon "on the estate Shahovsky, canceled the construction of business center at Hitrovskoy area. Dismissed Valery Shevchuk, chairman Moskomnasledie instead, transformed into the Department of the Moscow government was Alexander Kibovsky, before heading Rosokhrankultura.

It seems to be encouraging news. But at the same time, a number of new fires in the monuments of constructivism, the deplorable state of which remains the shame of the capital. Demolished pool "Dinamo", a sample of the Soviet neoclassicism. Resumed work on the reconstruction of the Junior World. It became known that Russia was not included in the list of historical cities of Russia, approved by Decree of the Ministry of Culture (the list itself has been reduced from 478 to 41 cities), state expertise as a draft "Ohta-Center in St. Petersburg.

That is a shift in the protection of monuments such as occurred, but it is very shaky. Meanwhile, the audience - from the stars of world architecture and opera directors to architectural critics, and State Duma deputies - is discussing what to do with the historical heritage. The discussions focused on the thesis: the old Moscow, and other Russian cities will never win the competition for global tourist flows to the pyramid of Cheops and Venice, but because of the Russian heritage is no economic future, if the defenders of the monuments dissatisfied with something, let him buy out the old house at developers.

The State Duma is preparing to adopt amendments to the Federal Law on cultural heritage sites, including - allowing the reconstruction of architectural monuments. Last Thursday, the Committee on the Arts (Chair - Gregory Ivliev) supported the amendments, although the entire working group - experts on the heritage - was strongly opposed. If the resolution of reconstruction in the second reading vote in the State Duma, the site of historic buildings is actually possible to build whatever they want. Arguments about Cheops with Venice and talk about what if the old house is not rebuilt, they fall apart themselves, because "no money", unwittingly grist to the mill "reenactors" from the State Duma.

Читать дальше... 

resist the rehash of the truths that preserve the monuments of the Fatherland, not in order to be profitable to sell (whether tourists, developers there - the difference is not singular), and stories about the covenants, for example, the author of "History of Ancient Art", the discoverer scientific value of the architectural heritage of Johann Winckelmann's or father's archaeological restoration of John Ruskin. In fact, the starting point of discussion is false, because it stems from a misunderstanding of the economy and heritage, and the reasons due to which formed the current situation around the monument.

Where are the parameters

The current federal law on cultural heritage objects allows to carry out conservation, repair, restoration and adaptation of the so-called monuments. "Adapting an object of cultural heritage for modern use - research, design and production work carried out in order to create conditions for the modern use of a cultural heritage site without changing its characteristics, are the subject of protection, including the restoration of a historical and cultural value of the elements of an Cultural Heritage "- the document says.

Translated from the legal to the consumer. No one makes today's owners of architectural monuments, whether these owners are businessmen or artists, opera and ballet, with wood to heat the room and use pit latrines. However, the subject of protection should be untouchable or renovated, it is possible to change much, but do not destroy that for which the house declared a monument. This may be a volume-spatial composition, the old walls and arches, the decoration of the facade, murals, woodwork - anything that may have artistic or historical (scientific) value.

The most common today kind of abuse is associated with an incorrect "reduction" of the object of protection. Thus, the Moscow government did not notice anything valuable in the interiors of the Children's Peace (Order of the Government of Moscow from December 30, 2005 № 2736-RP), which allowed to compose a project in which the total building area increased from 57.5 thousand square meters. m to 74 thousand

That's how easy it is opened casket. If you can cram into a house in the heart of the extra 17 thousand feet, no tourism, no benefits, no boards and commissions will not stop an investor in the way of minimizing the object of protection. Introduction to the law to preserve the monuments, the words "repair" or "reconstruction" (under the Town Planning Code, this change in the parameters of capital construction objects, their parts - the amount of space, height, number of storeys, area, indicators of capacity, the volume - and the quality of engineering support) in the current situation will only resolve the current lewdness. Imagine: if push pedestrians officially allowed to everyone, not just those who are now doing so with impunity ...

The ban on reconstruction involves more than a ban on the adaptation of historic buildings to modern needs. It only restricts the ability to extract excessive profits from the additional square meters. And by the way, creating obstacles for the uncontrolled and inconsistent with the purposes of development of functional overload of historic districts.

Lack of planning

The devil, as we know, lies not in laws, and regulations. To stop the current lasciviousness, do only one thing - the universally adopt the Rules of Land Use and Development (PHC) or town planning regulations, locating sites for the historic buildings of their existing technical and economic indicators, and in some cases even reduce them, mindful of the remedial demolition landfill extensions .

By law, the City of Moscow "On special order regulation of urban planning in historic areas of Moscow and in the territories of zones of protection of cultural heritage sites in the city of Moscow," the town plans a special type can be regulated by a fairly wide range of options - from a functional purpose and size of buildings to the materials and amenities. The problem is that often these regulations are developed and issued a separate decision of the Moscow government has in the presence of some interest to the territory, and wittingly or unwittingly to him oriented. It would be planned to develop regulations for all historic areas. And it's not a matter of mere historical heritage, is a question of urban planning in general.


In large cities, monuments to ruin, not because there is no money for restoration. Reason is different - in the current legal environment, the owner always expects profit

Must adopt the rules and for the territories of monuments. Now it is considered unnecessary (the law allowed a maximum of restoration), but knowing many cases similar to the reconstruction of the Junior World, there is every reason to reconsider that position. Another option - to prescribe more of the subject, limiting the liberties of some rigid figures, functionality and other parameters.

But the Rules of Land Use and Development in Moscow, have already adopted the first reading of the Moscow City Duma - a case of simple theft is worse. With a huge number of bands (almost every piece of land - a separate area) for the historic areas have used the same few parameters as for the whole city: the height, density, built-up. It is clear that in security zones more often than not can be, for example, a single maximum height of building: somewhere you want to save Prozorov, somewhere - to comply with a historic slant roof height and eaves. Only after the preparation of the detailed regulations of some special type of the resulting figures may be (or rather, for reference) recorded in the citywide PHC.

Further in the world have already worked out. Small grants for restoration, exemptions from taxes or any more pleasant things to the owner or developer of the monument - and the number of items will begin to grow before our eyes. Yes, the super will not, but how we decided that the development business should win the competition for the profitability of drug trafficking?

The war palaces

It is time to remember about Moscow's empty and crumbling historic homes. It is unlikely that anyone will be surprised to learn that virtually every such house owners are with the project "Regeneration", located at a certain stage of approval (of course, with the expected "additional weights in several floors). A deserted house is the result of deliberate "reduction of the subject" by the elements, the so-called bryusselizatsiya (on behalf of the city, where this method is actively used in the 60-ies). Another option - we see the ruins belonging to the poor cultural institutions, posed a choice: whether to cut off his leg to save his hand. However, they often lack entrepreneurial spirit, and too often are experts in bryusselizatsii. In most cases monuments in major cities to ruin, not because there is no money for restoration. The reason lies elsewhere: the legal environment is such that the owner expects to profit.

A separate theme - the abandoned manor or church somewhere in the outback. But, perhaps, they were the money if we do not engage in embezzlement novodelnyh to build palaces.

Look at the numbers. Palace of Alexis in Kolomna, log onto concrete frame - a billion rubles. Programme budget for the preservation of monuments of the Culture of the Russian North (2011-2014 gg.) "Which was recently adopted by the Government of the Arkhangelsk region - 387.8 million rubles. A Russian North, as is known, is famous for its unique authentic wooden architecture.

Do not make us re-palaces of XVII century with a rich interior decoration in the rooms such as "secretary to the Duma chamber" or "obschetsarskaya soap", probably we would have enough money on new buildings for our cultural institutions, who recently appeared frequently pioneers of the reconstructions. So, in 2001, artistic director of the Helikon Opera, Dmitry Bertman was still hoping for another building. Electron pair of rooms in Kolomna less, and would not have had an opera director talks about the Nazi bomb, happily hit it where Andrei Bokov designed the new hall "Helicon".

Today, when new, may not be as dvortsovolyubivom mayor, in being on the same Nikitskaya as "Helicon", the Conservatory has a chance to give up another project, the president of the Union of Architects sides - reconstruction of the Synod House, where they lived Kastalsky, Chesnokov, Danilin and try to find a new location for its library. Actually, this is - of city planning.

For what you pay

Arguments about the unavailability of public monuments to buy from developers - this is pure speculation. Citizens should not pay for invented assigned to someone thousands of square meters. The problem of the urban community in the other - through their government set the rules. During that citizens have already paid - on what taxes are collected by the treasury? Including the preparation of town planning regulations, and if this too late - to correct the mistakes of urban planners.

The story of the Hitrovskoy area - a vivid example of the problem from scratch. With our thirst for retrorazvitiyu urban environment any more or less honest specialist, without the pressure of the investor and the government would point out the former area as a zone not subject to building and the building was demolished recently to College recorded in the objects that do not conform to the regulations and subject to demolition in the case accident (under paragraph 8 of Article 36 of the Town Planning Code). Investor, we recall, wanted to build on the area of a business center, residents and heritage advocates are trying to save space.

Actions Sergei Sobyanin to cancel construction Khitrovo is encouraging manifestation of the norm. Clear public demand for recreation areas, there are legitimate, but erroneous contract with the developer. Solution: The developer, if he promoted his bill - compensation, the townspeople - the area, the budget - unfortunately, losses. A few more such decisions (stop the destruction of the Children's World ", removal of a large stage Helikon with Nikitskaya, minimal preservation for the winter evacuated crumbling monuments, which the list is long and many times published) - and, look, the authorities will include a taste for a reasonable expenditure of urban budget. But there - will have new horizons and the quality of urban planning.

Let us not deceive ourselves, to preserve the memory of his own past, at a cost. Even countries that successfully use the arsenal of legal and economic means to protect the heritage, lose their monuments. Since the days of Winckelmann's circle of stored objects all expanded, and the obscure most of the Europeans of the XVIII century preservation of ancient ruins, we came to an obscure most of the Muscovites preserve the ruins of a constructivist industrial architecture. Hence the constant debate - on what would have to earn to be able to save all that we consider valuable. In Berlin, for example, want to introduce an additional travel fee of two euros per night in a hotel in Italy painting in churches are illuminated only when you throw a coin into the machine. But nobody wants to "recover" Baths of Caracalla, and offers no social worker protesting their purchase.

Recently in Pompeii collapsed house gladiators killed ancient frescoes. The public is convinced that it was due to insufficient funding for conservation work. Violent protests is to reduce the budget of the Ministry of Culture. It is in Italy, with its 5.6%of the world tourism market (third place in the EU), 12%of the share of tourism in the country's GDP. But think: Pompeii - a huge empty city ruins, which can only show and need to constantly maintain, including parts that are inaccessible to tourists, not to mention the fact that he was not fully excavated. In Russia, not even close no such problems. And if there is an allusion to their weak shadow, we solve the problem quickly, as now it is done in St. Petersburg. Unreasonable archaeologists have unearthed at the site of the projected "Ohta-Center several Swedish and Russian fortresses (one of them - the times of Alexander Nevsky Russian). But the persons concerned have hired others who do not see any particular value of finds, nor the ability to save them. Unreasonable seised of the case.

And in Turkey in the near future as a result of running the dam will be flooded Allianoy resort, built in the II century under the Emperor Hadrian. According to estimates of the authorities, the profits from the project is 52 million dollars. International organizations, including UNESCO, are fighting for the preservation of the city. But so far appeals to Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan did not bring any results. It is obvious that the preservation of heritage does not depend on its "class" - only on the understanding it is priceless. Otherwise, there will always be more profitable "reconstruction project.

http://www.expert.ru/2010/11/29/ot-v...a-do-erdogana/

[Тютчев]

Medvedev asked to prohibit the reconstruction of historical monuments

A group of scientists, architects, museum professionals, experts in cultural heritage preservation appealed to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev called for a veto on the amendments to the Law "On Objects of Cultural Heritage", in fact, legalizing the construction activities on historical monuments. Text of open letter to Medvedev published "Gazetoy.Ru". Its sign, in particular, the deputy director of the Moscow Kremlin Museums Andrei Batalov, the president of the Russian Academy of Architecture and building sciences, Alexander Kudryavtsev, chairman of the central council of the All-Russian Society for the Preservation of Historical and Cultural Galina Malanicheva.
Speech in a letter to the so-called "amendment Pleskachevsky," named after the motion to the parliament chairman of the Duma Committee on Property Viktor Pleskachevsky. In fact, the amendments developed by the Government of St. Petersburg. The greatest concern is the defenders of cultural heritage is the fact that the amendments introduced into the law the term "the reconstruction of cultural heritage" (that is allowed to conduct construction work on the monuments, which is unacceptable, for example, during the restoration) and allows you to exclude sites from the register the decision of the Ministry of Culture and not the Government. According to the developers, the amendments are necessary for business development, in particular, simplify the registration of real property and adaptations of old buildings to modern use.

Committee on Culture, the State Duma and created in him an expert group (it includes many of the signatories of the letter Medvedev) twice rejected the amendments as harmful to the conservation of cultural heritage and promote corruption. Nov. 25 Board, contrary to the opinion of the expert group recommended that the State Duma adopted amendments.

Against amendments Pleskachevsky " acted as a social movement and defenders of the monument" Arhnadzor ". In a statement the movement quoted State Duma Deputy Yelena Drapeko faktkah of "direct pressure" on members of the Committee on Culture in the discussion of amendments.

http://www.lenta.ru/news/2010/12/02/letter2/

[Тютчев]