Realistic art of the Soviet period

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Fantozzi; 2555741"

concerning the recognition in the world of this period, see www. tmora.org

A link to the museum here in the forum gave five years ago in this theme. >
And by the way there:

Сообщение от qwerty; 105495 ​​"

Are you seriously mistaken , I think all the United States, along with Britain not even make up a dozen galleries in which socialist realism presented at least one picture. There are a couple of figures that the restructuring grabbed for a song of this genre , and are now trying to sell them for at least some money. Foreigners have grown and raised on a very different cultural values, social realism they cause less interest than the art of Burma , there is at least some exotic ...

[artcol]

There are a couple of figures that the restructuring grabbed for a song of this genre, and now they are trying to sell at least for some money

This allegation.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от artcol; 2555781"

This allegation.

You know better , but the author of this, as you put it , "allegation" has consistently describes the London Russian sales Sotheby's /Christie's , recently are just painted from Maastricht TEFAF, as well , and I suspect that it is still a little better than you know the situation in the western market . >

[Fantozzi]

Cyril went through your link, read the opinions of previous debates on a similar theme (this was before I joined the forum .) Understood - your position clearly negative for this period of art. Frankly, I would like to find more supporters , not critics of the discussion - it would be interesting to exchange views , may find new authors in the regions, etc., etc.
Speriamo che arrivera il tempo. Arrivederci.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Fantozzi; 2555911"

Understood - your position clearly negative on the art of the period.

Yes that is my position. My position is simple: I love some of the " art of the Soviet period ", but even a lot, but the talk-then we are not on the likes /dislikes , and about investment or, if anything, less pafostno - on the art market.
By the way, I think the topic:

In the art world, the case of commercial developments that affect the story. About some of the auctions of contemporary art it is clear that they have been "turning" and become "legendary". That's the fair, as is quite common phenomenon in the country, for the Russian art was a remarkable event. Fair to our country as the guest of honor has occurred, such as the Madrid ARCO. But here besides eight galleries, has agreed to a separate "Russian platform," Our artists were represented by more than 20 booths of 140. Decent stats!

In weighty international environment and they looked quite well, comparing favorably to the best examples of the conceptual solution and plastic quality. Still, attended by almost all the key names, except Kabakov. Artist, which I personally think is the most important in modern Russian history - Erik Bulatov Parisian gallery Pièce Unique gave all stand. Concept selection of photos from Kharkov Boris Mikhailov occupied one of the two walls of a huge boxing Suzanne Tarasiève, another fit object of Krasnodar Recycle, whose installation "Facade" greeted the audience - but it was a lot all the days - in front of the Grand Palais. Several galleries exhibited a series of papers recently departed Vlad Mamysheva Monroe. Fair turned lively and full of discoveries that have no commute to Frieze and FIAC, so, in turn, to those no one expects "Russia at a party."

Selection of galleries "Russian platform" (Booth gallery pop /off /art was in the central area because of the Berlin branch) might seem strange and previously was criticized: Heavyweights "Regina" and "Triumph" refused to participate, but were added alien topical contexts "Erarta" and "Heritage". Absence of the first had no effect (the same Pepperstein, Callimachus and Kulik, recently featured in "Regina", was seen in Iragui, Anne de Villepoix and Rabouan Moussion respectively), while the Moscow asked Grinberg Photos (during the fair news arrived in time for inclusion Bakhareva - exactly on their side of the center - in the main project of the Venice Biennale) and St. Petersburg gallery Gisich two main masters of the Northern capital - Vitaly Pushnitsky and Kerim Ragimov.

(a)

[Fantozzi]

And I'm talking about investments and markets, especially as an investor and I am. Only supporters of the period trying to change the situation on the market , to promote the period while you vysskazyvaya their point of view, trying to slow down the process. So what, read the article . What would you like to say something? That none of the works of realists do not quite live up to "Beetle" Kabakov ? What - do not understand , sorry.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Fantozzi; 2555951"

and you, vysskazyvaya their point of view, trying to slow down the process .

I express my opinion , and I think no opinion of an individual expressed the forum can not " inhibit this process ". >

Сообщение от Fantozzi; 2555951"

So what, read the article . What would you say ?

In Paris, Socialist Realism was not. >

[artcol]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

has consistently

Read Hegel.

[Маруся]

Сообщение от Fantozzi; 2555591"

For Marousi. Dear, Marusya. Do not forget that the art of socialism developed in complete informational isolation. I do not know how old you are , but I remember a time when any import thing - pens, lighters , chewing gum - it was like a message from outer space. For chewing could give half of my life . And this is born of complete isolation , for example , a style ( direction) - called harsh. When the artist conveys the only color , which is not that beautiful life in the USSR. Is this not a destination , not a separate segment in the world of art ?

Well, judging by the profile , you and almost the same age , however , chewing gum and me as a teenager was not interested ...

But as art because in my opinion it is written :

That's why (because it wrote) I refer to as " directions" so-called " severe style " and "second avant-garde " (name not come up with me)

And that's why for me the word "Soviet academicians " and " first names " - an empty phrase

[artcol]

Сообщение от Marusya

"Soviet academicians"

Soviet academics it is not an empty word ...
Russian - yes, and Soviet - no.