How to unleash the artist

[fabosch]

Сообщение от iside

I'm very strange to read about what I know or do not know or that I'm going to do, from the party's existence, which I had no idea until this very conversation and not even know who that is all. Naturally my desire to clarify the situation. You seem?

Of course, iside, everyone comes to their understanding, and it would be odd to deny it.

Сообщение от iside

I used to try not to pay attention to the provocative phrase, out of respect for the forum and participants. It ended badly. Because it was perceived as "A, it does not respond, so scared! Atu it!" Times have changed.

I warn you once, I can safely veer

Сообщение от spigo

I think it's better to be skinny pragmatist.

No, honestly, you're right.
Just from me your suggestions can be only the first part

[kazerov]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

"Souvenirs", a souvenir (from Fr. souvenir-memory, memory), too, are different.
I recently showed nice souvenir. What do you think how much this Souvenir stands? A, Peter? Do you have a "real picture" for the price of this "souvenir"?

Although you may be funny, but I have a real painting, for which no one pledlozhit money are the same as for that souvenir, but suggested I change it to this souvenir - I refuse. because for me this painting - the art of it - art of for my children and my children's children.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от kazerov

because for me this painting - the art of it - art of for my children and my children's children.

And Aivazovsky for someone to art. No? Even this "Souvenir."
And by the way, I something about money, since then remembered

Сообщение от Peter; 1343701"

"stream" product (even a car).

and if we are on the site forum Investing in art.

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от kazerov

even though you may be funny, but I have a real picture

And you show and no one is ridiculous already, may not be that "the nightingale fables feeding" ...
Paintings, I think, more interesting to consider rather than read about them.

[kazerov]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

So Aivazovsky for someone to art. No? Even this "Souvenir."
And by the way, I something about money, since then remembered

and if we are on the site forum Investing in art.

Added after 2 minutes

And you show and no one is ridiculous already, may not be that "the nightingale fables feeding" ... Paintings, I think, more interesting to consider, rather than read about them.
___________________

For example, see picture Our No new posts and I see even at her estimate.

indisputable. and I'm talking about investing in art. Once you are mostly about art and I'm talking about work. probyval insert, but not mastered. figured out.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от kazerov

once you have for the most part about the artists and the work I'm talking about

I'm sorry, "mostly" about the money.

[fabosch]

Сообщение от kazerov

indisputable.
and I'm talking about investing in art.
Once you are mostly about art and I'm talking about work.
probyval insert, but not mastered.
figured out.

Picture pretty.
Reminiscent of Josef Albers

[Fed]

Сообщение от kazerov

it - art of for my children and my children's children.

And your children's children had been notified that this will be for them to art.
Although I now understand more meaningful definition of "art has the right to call any activity aimed at creating aesthetically expressive forms."

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от "Tasha, 1344331

Do you think there was, I think, was, and judging by the fact that in your post you one spasibki not set, it all felt something.

By the way, "spasibki" I have already set.

It's now supposed to mean?

[kazerov]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

I'm sorry, "mostly" about the money.

you about money, but I'm talking about money.

Added after 1 minutes

Сообщение от Fed

And your children's children had been notified that this will be for them to art.
Although I now understand more meaningful definition of "art has the right to call any activity aimed at creating aesthetically expressive forms."

with or without notice, and children's children what it would be for the art, it does not matter. it - the art and it was already. see what it was, in the words of any activity - fell kuchka crap. I know the art a little differently, but you must excuse me not going to spread understanding of art. and of course the "Classics" of negative emotions I have no objections.

[Fed]

Сообщение от fabosch; 1344821"

cute picture. Reminiscent of Josef Albers

Recalls, not the word. Albers, these boxes with a cart drawn by WHO Fig. 1, 2, and kazerov decided to remake them into rectangles. Correct decision, I have repeatedly on the forum wrote that young artists to make smarter food-compile better go.
  But for uhodimosti I do not understand why kazerov puts such prices for their compilation of Malevich and Mondrian Fig. 3, 4 - $ 8000 and $ 3500. This and much-hyped.

  Maybe that's the price associated negative feedback on your work hud.forume:
"It is absolutely empty of work, the author seems to have forgotten to fill them with meaning. Maybe we should search his idea and not copy the proverbial?
Well, brilliant, brilliant ... and how not tired? "