Draft Guelman "Believe in Tver!".

[Ika-Ika]

This Zelenin doomed when the Kremlin dinner plate found in his rain-worm in its salate.On somehow managed to photograph on the sly, to show the world and to express their indignation at the dinner.
And if he ate it and asked for additions, it can be and has remained at the helm.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

About the trust do not know, but the Volga envoy has cut once: Gregory Rapota "
White night in Perm "have become a brand in the region.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Konstantin

The fact that Darwin was wrong, very easy to prove.

Here is a very easy proof correctness of evolution, just as for the students:

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от artcol; 1626681"

But in my opinion, in the 21st century to believe that man evolved from apes - this is obscurantism

So even in the XIX century obrazavannye people did not believe that man descended from apes:
 

you were pleased to write that man descended from monkeys orangutashek obezyanskih tribes, etc. Forgive me, old man, but I'm with you on this important item do not agree and Can you put a comma. For if a man, the ruler of the world, from the respiratory umneyshee beings descended from apes stupid and ignorant that he had a tail and a savage voice. If we descended from apes, we are now led to the cities of Gypsies in the show and we would pay money for the show each other, dancing on the orders of the Gypsy or sitting behind bars in a zoo. Have we covered all around with hair? Are we not wear robes, of which deprived monkeys? Would we have loved and would not be a woman scorned, if at least a little of it would have smelled a monkey, which we see every Tuesday at the Marshal of the Nobility? If our ancestors were descended from apes, then they would not buried in a Christian cemetery, my great-grandfather like Ambrose, who lived in it in the kingdom of Poland, was buried, not as a monkey, and next to a Catholic with Abate Joachim Shostak, whose notes of a temperate climate and immoderate use of hot drinks are kept until now still have my brother Ivan (Maiora). Abat mean Catholic priest.

 > > >

[artcol]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

So even in the XIX century obrazavannye people did not believe that man descended from apes:
 
 
> > >

Cyril, you do believe in evolution?
In this primitive, mechanistic theory of the origin of species in the spirit of the views of the 19th century?
What you give!
>

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от artcol

You do believe in evolution?

After reading this, of course, you cease to believe, [COLOR="
DarkSlateGray"]" that man evolved from monkeys orangutashek obezyanskih tribes "[/COLOR].
>

[artcol]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

read this, of course , you cease to believe , [COLOR=DarkSlateGray"]" that man evolved from monkeys orangutashek obezyanskih tribes "[/COLOR]. >

Cyril, the question of the origin of a very complex, we can say fundamental . Darwin's theory corresponds to the views of the 19th century , but in the age of 20 as a strange claim that natural selection we owe the appearance of the diversity of species of flora and fauna and the appearance of man. Simply put - it is unscientific .

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от artcol; 1910491"

but in the age of 20 as a strange claim that natural selection we owe the appearance of the diversity of species of flora and fauna and the appearance of man .

Natural selection is not an appearance of diversity of flora and fauna.
I even understand it - never biologist .
Natural selection according to Darwin - a process that leads to survival and reproduction are better suited to the environment of individuals.

Сообщение от artcol; 1910491"

To put it simply - it is unscientific .

You, the scientist knows better, but I gave no accident fragment "Letters to the scientist neighbor ." >

[artcol]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

Natural selection is not an appearance of diversity of flora and fauna.
...
Natural selection according to Darwin - a process that leads to survival and reproduction are better suited to the environment of individuals.

Cyril, you really decide ... How would you like to say, or remove the cross or wearing pants . So you rewrite and Darwin in order to prove his innocence >

By the way , tell his version of the theory of evolution (the one to the second you hold ). Can we argue and nothing - we just do not understand each other.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от artcol; 1910541"

How would you like to say, or remove the cross or wearing pants . So you rewrite and Darwin in order to prove his innocence >

Why do I need to prove anything its kind of " right "?
I just re-reading a writer whom you do not read , I remember your words and respond to them, that's all. >

Сообщение от artcol; 1626681"

But in my opinion , in the 21st century to believe that man evolved from apes - this is obscurantism