Monet exhibition at the Grand Palais in Paris

[kr555]

A neo-Russian /pseudo-Russian style it is eclectic. I have this word in this case, nothing derogatory can not find it entirely appropriate. And the paper of Hartmann is also a very pretty eclectic, consisting of a completely Russian elements. Why did all this attribute to some external roots, just do not understand.

Added after 1 minutes

Сообщение от "Cyril Syzransky

This is a Russian school in architecture?

Well, if half of Russia built on this - why would it not be called the Russian school?
The value of this school, you can argue, but I personally like a lot.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от kr555

I have this word in this case, nothing derogatory, I do not find it entirely appropriate.

And I do not find it, and I think this definition is appropriate.
But the conversation turned to the original in Russian architecture.
But I saw nothing constructive.
But if you want to call home constructed, for example, neomavritanskom neo-Byzantine style, or in the homes of some of the "Russian school", then say so, that the Russian school is the eclecticism, the normal and it will not be a purely Russian invention.

[kr555]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

And I do not find it, and I think this definition is appropriate.
But the conversation turned to the original in Russian architecture.
But I saw nothing constructive.
But if you want to call home constructed, for example, neomavritanskom neo-Byzantine style, or in the homes of some of the "Russian school", then say so, that the Russian school is eclectic, but it will not be a purely Russian invention.

If we are looking for is originality in the modern sense - we are limited to the twentieth century, before the original was not inherent value. I'm under the original understanding something else. If in Mauritania or Byzantium, we can not find something very similar on paper Hartmann gates, or at the Yaroslavl station Shechtel if it can not be confused with anything - so it's a Russian phenomenon.
That winter, or Smolny could be built in any European country, where there are buildings there before. But Yaroslavsky could only be built in Russia, I analogs are not known.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от kr555; 1346461]If we are looking for is originality[/QUOTE]

No, for example, I'm not looking for originality, I tried to answer the question

[QUOTE="Peter; 1345981

And is there a Russian architecture in its pure form, as a school?

[fabosch]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

No, I'm, like, not looking for originality, I tried to answer the question whether there is a Russian architecture in its pure form, as a school?

Here something I do not understand.
Where are you all Delhi Pskov architecture with her needlework, and Dmitrovskiy cathedral, and the Intercession on the Nerl?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

- sorry, a chapel, too ... I ruined? (c)

fabosch, I'm nowhere did not go away.

Want these monuments attributed to a certain "Russian architectural school", please.

There is an opera with a ballet yet to take the heap ...

[kr555]

Cyril Syzransky, yes, exactly, and that this neo-Russian style in my opinion, too, Russian architecture in its purest form. That is nowhere more precisely this was not, and we had and was, moreover, not a single specimen, and the school. She would have lived longer, the demand for such has not disappeared anywhere, but devastation forced to come up with constructivism.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

All agreed to accept your thesis with one of my little point and close this topic.

Сообщение от kr555

, this neo-Russian style (Art Nouveau) In my view, too, Russian architecture in its purest form.

 

[kr555]

Then it is as follows:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

, this neo-Russian style (a precursor of Art Nouveau style) in my opinion, too, Russian architecture in its pure form.

 


But the subject in any case must be closed of course.

[Peter]

tchaika, thank you very much for the material on this exhibition Mone.Seychas I am holding a luxury catalog and naslazhdayus.Da namely, that for 50 evro.U us this would cost at least twice bolshe.Prezident Sarkozy opens edition ! French pariotizm in deystvii.U us is hardly possible to imagine! parents of my close friend's accidental that during this time were in Paris! Esemeska accidentally came!