Prices for contemporary art

[L-ana64110]

Price now more independent of where and to whom you sell it or offer.
Especially in our country: the availability of money the buyer has not yet determined its cultural level, and vice versa, very highly Intelligent people do not have sufficient funds to pay for now although it recognizes that its thin. value
This requires and promouscheny in an appropriate environment \\\\ example Nikas \\\\ <!--~ 10 ->

[mihailovoh]

[Pavel]

Сообщение от L-ana64110

Price now more independent of where and to whom you sell it or offer.
Especially in our country: the availability of money the buyer has not yet determined its cultural level, and vice versa, very highly Intelligent people do not have sufficient funds to pay for now although it recognizes that its thin. value
This requires and promouscheny in an appropriate environment \\\\ example Nikas \\\\

It's not a cultural level, and not even solvency. It is our mistake. The point is whether the buyer to sell the purchased now and for what dengue. Do you sell to someone and they get tired of painting. Where to sell it? That still would not be easy and simple, the picture will be very difficult to sell. and it is not in season and not in crisis. After selling previously purchased the painting, you can get out of any crisis, but on condition that these paintings are a talented artist, bought legally, and while prices are fixed by this artist on ranih sales. Talents rostut prices and a weak fall, but everything should be transparent. I should add that this is not applicable under conditions of high prices, those same thousands of $.
Nikos is possible only in the absence of rules. Crime is relative to the buyer. I feel sorry for them, because they will be disappointed. This is purely ruslyandskoe case.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

It is our mistake. The point is whether the buyer to sell the purchased now and for what denga. [/QUOTE]

A wealthy man who earned $ 100-150m for 10-15 years, of course, a certain distrust is related to the purchase of a modern artist, who may not be worth anything in the next 20 years. Units of this category of purchasers to take seriously the idea of collecting sovriska.
Obvious guarantee the preservation and enhancement of here and the truth is not observed.
I deliberately now discussing a class of people with such incomes, because even 20-30 collectors of people, they can turn the tide on our hopelessly provincial art market.
So, I want to authoritatively note that we have not collected a and 20 major private collectors of contemporary art. And I do not speak about Moscow, but the whole of Russia as a whole.
Those that are sure to appeal to us in the department of contemporary art at the Tretyakov Gallery and the Russian Museum. [/FONT]

[Pavel]

A wealthy man who earned $ 100-150m for 10-15 years, of course, a certain distrust is related to the purchase of a modern artist, who may not be worth anything in the next 20 years. Units of this category of purchasers to take seriously the idea of collecting sovriska.
Obvious guarantee the preservation and enhancement of here and the truth is not observed.
I deliberately now discussing a class of people with such incomes, because even 20-30 collectors of people, they can turn the tide on our hopelessly provincial art market.
So, I want to authoritatively note that we have not collected a and 20 major private collectors of contemporary art. And I do not speak about Moscow, but the whole of Russia as a whole.
Those that are sure to appeal to us in the department of contemporary art at the Tretyakov Gallery and the Russian Museum. [/FONT][/QUOTE]

So for me, is not an authoritative opinion from the official GTG.
Everyone should show and sell at the same time, then the value of all of them will be correct.
It's funny when artists called the original only because they make abstractions. As for the market, we talked a lot and wasted. How simple and profitable to do so difficult to grasp apparently.
And not to be confused museum and collection. The museum is achieving and unbribable and collection, it's improvisation and the search for these achievements and the ability to sell and make money and switch to a higher level or another.
If anyone has earned the money, he postoraetsya insure your success and the purchase of the masterpieces of one of the ways. If you have earned.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

So for me, is not an authoritative opinion from the official GTG. [/QUOTE]
[/FONT][/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]

[L-ana64110]

In St. Petersburg has become the norm to set prices for paintings in galleries and salons in 4-5 times the price of the artist prevyschayuschey
though the price charged to the amount of 120-250 - thousands upper limit of \\\\ what I know of an artist is 30-60 thousand, and it can be called the art market? Strong and serious artists, and therefore prefer to look for links overseas, where a fixed margin of 40-100%and buying opportunities above.
Our art lovers prefer to buy from the artist himself, and a pleasant chat and price without overpayments. Now if you want any artist can be found in the Institute and to contact directly.
Gallerist should think, what will their policies mnogokratnooe overpricing?

[Pavel]

[/FONT]

[/QUOTE]
Suprematism is left, revolutionary art. It was created in defiance of cubism. Well, not in opposition but as a great style and such is. Like Cubism Suprematism moved to a new realism on the stage, Suprematism realism. This is natural.
But the left MOSH is podrozhatelskoe so angered Khrushchev. Like any imitation, and pastiche that value is not only as a historical incident.
A rebellion of the sixties amateurs in their struggle for what is official orders, which they did not have, but they are interested in foreigners for some reason, and prices in the $ 10000 they had at the time was not uncommon. But as soon as they left everything changed vice versa. Again, the lack of originality and the availability of local artists.
And you should not expect, and soul pour out.

[QUOTE=L-ana64110;1281402] in St. Petersburg has become the norm to set prices for paintings in galleries and salons in 4-5 times the price of the artist prevyschayuschey
though the price charged to the amount of 120-250 - thousands upper limit of \\\\ what I know of an artist is 30-60 thousand, and it can be called the art market? Strong and serious artists, and therefore prefer to look for links overseas, where a fixed margin of 40-100%and buying opportunities above.
Our art lovers prefer to buy from the artist himself, and a pleasant chat and price without overpayments. Now if you want any artist can be found in the Institute and to contact directly.
Gallerist should think, what will their policies mnogokratnooe overpricing? This is called the criminalization of the market. But these traders simply fools, because instead of one and tighter thing to sell a lot of times and each time receive 15%, they are trying to get everything at once and receive many times less. Greed - stupidity.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[/QUOTE]
Yes, this is S. Mikhalkov, wrote in 1952:

All of these anti-patriots,
All this bitty ford
In Washington banknotes
 And the honor and conscience sell.

 

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy

Yes, this is S. Mikhalkov, wrote in 1952:

All of these anti-patriots,
All this bitty ford
In Washington banknotes
 And the honor and conscience sell.
You see, even Mikhalkov. As a result, they are devalued and disgraced themselves.
I do not blame that they stylists.

 

The auction sells one and tighter thing many times. As a result, the thing becomes known, with a certain price and cataloged.