Almost every second Russian believes that there is no intellectual

[zarajara]

Сообщение от Pavel

Odell suit and have an intellectual ? Well, another deodorant to spend. And I thought ! I thought that we should know a lot and something meaningful to do. It turns out the marriage of any intellectual notorious conman ? <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

Pavel, then read the message after that, then it becomes clear what is at stake .
However, it seems to me that you and so you know, and even then I do not understand - why did you write this?
 
To what?

1. To you answered " no question about it "?
2. To start on a new chew already been said ?
3. Show that only you have the intelligence of these criteria , in contrast to , for example, me?
4. Just like that ?

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Magnolia

It should be in a special sense , then, is the knowledge of the non-existence. Its really want to tell people . First - the stage of Tongues , because this is not the name Novi . The image also has not picked up . Then - the poetry , because the rod - rhythm rhymes groping way . If the powerful aesthetics , the image portrayed . And all this for humanity, for the people. Since implementing social intellectual. More in the essays "Intel ..." in my diary .

I understand you explain how a poet. Usually poetry is estimated to result. Apoliner was deeply sentient man and poet .....
The question on my intel or intelligence does not bother me . I care about when they say it is a hard worker , and this is an intellectual. I believe that most of the intellectuals came because they were hard workers .

[zarajara]

Сообщение от Pavel

The question on my intel or intelligence does not bother me . I care about when they say it is a hard worker , and this is an intellectual. I believe that most of the intellectuals came because they were hard workers .

Pavel, please read carefully the reports to which react. It was not about your intelligence, it was an exclusive possession of criteria intelligence. Affect you personally, I would never become.
Two . And why not say it is an intellectual, a hard worker, is an aristocrat , a tycoon , a farmer , etc. ? If there is no society in the definitions it is impossible to navigate. It is not necessary to ascribe positive or negative these characteristics .
Three . Regarding the differences between the intellectual, intellectual, business and simply a moral man in an exchange of views we have come to some agreement. If you still have to carefully read the previous messages , I think , agree.

[Магнолия]

Сообщение от Pavel; 2088481"

I am worried about when they say it is a hard worker , and it is intellectual. I believe that most of the intellectuals came because they were hard workers .

I believe that the nature of the differences in philosophical approach to the creation of the work. This applies to artists and poets, and musicians.
Once I discussed this topic with a poet friend of God, and then described the essence of the conversation in his essay "La Boheme ," which today 'll find in their files and put in the diary for you.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Tyutchev, 2073411"

Most Russians believe that intellectuals do not have much influence on events in the country, and about half of the population does believe that the intelligentsia in Russia is almost gone

Modern Russia - a country of victorious lumpen. Although quantitatively lumpen not prevail, they will surely dominate today's Russian society, forcing last its "rules of conduct." And now as a consequence, they are also the politically dominant class, managing the state power as a trophy. Simply put, Russia Today - "bosyatskoe state", and Putin - "bosyatsky king."

All the Russian dictatorship similar to each other, and the transcript of the trial of Joseph Brodsky ("parasite") looks as disgusting as the transcript of the trial of Pussy Riots («koschunnits"). However the social nature of these dictatorships completely different. And even if in the future the Putin regime is equal to the level of repression against the Soviets, and possibly outperform it, nothing to do with the Soviet authorities, except the striking resemblance, it will not have.

The Soviet system was a kind of "genetically modified" social product. Bolshevism instilled a broad peasant trunk twig Western modernism. After 70 years, this tree is rotten, and not having given birth to the promised seed. True, the land remains the roots from which the top runners have got ugly obscure nature.

Today, all the old Soviet class (classes in the European sense of the word in Russia has never been) degraded, and new ones have not had time to form. In a community like never before, a lot of "wicked people" ready for anything "social freelancers", not bound by any corporate, moral, and even more so the legal ties.

At the basis of "Putinism" are not country (so vain writers villagers because of it baked), and lumpen ideals. This is its main difference from the Soviet government. This is the difference, which many do not follow. "Putinism" - political system déclassé elements, all of those who dropped out of their social niches or do they never had. Probably it would look, if Russia Stenka Razin took the Kremlin. In place of the philosophy of the community came to the philosophy of "common fund».

(a)
\\\\ \\\\ \\\\ \\\\ \\\\ \\\\ \\\\ \\\\ \\\\ \\\\

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

tithe a tenth of their income , to give its recipient for church needs.
And how?
 All Russian - Orthodox Church and must pay.
Right now in Moscow will build 600 temples programa " walking " them quickly erected , all residents will attribute to a particular parish and start collecting.
And can and will collect first , and then you and these prefabricated collapsible church of siding built .

Brad. Orthodoxy is one of the branches of Judaism, along with levoslavnymi , etc. masulmanami smaller. I am an atheist . I do not believe that God chose a stone desert and small narodik , kachuyuschy with their flocks on this desert. Let the Jews believe is their local god . In this case, the policy of the state , even if it pays for the church and other nonsense , but from his own pocket.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Pavel; 2219041 "

This is the policy of the state , even if it pays for the church and other nonsense, but from his own pocket .

The state hands you select deputies to pass a law tomorrow and you will be obliged to pay tithes to this church. Legislation. And give up - Apply effects - fines and " turn off the gas."

Сообщение от Pavel; 2219041"

I am an atheist .

And atheists will be called " crazy" and begin their compulsory treatment of atheism , since it is , according to the Orthodox, disease.

Here's to you and

Сообщение от Pavel; 2219041"

Brad .

[artcol]

Pastukhov article about the revolution.

Revolution can not be avoided
It is possible that the revolution that so frightens the Russian intelligentsia in this situation would be no evil and good .

All of which he accuses Russia - is a consequence of previous revolutions.

So rally around a single regulator of Great Russia Vladimir Vladimirych ! Amen.

[sur]

Сообщение от artcol; 2219071"

So rally around a single regulator of Great Russia Vladimir Vladimirych ! Amen .

 At least, let's understand that the alternative is not available , Vladimir Vladimirovich , and the next 12-18 years (as long as it will have real power ) is not that-be there we did not try skzazat liberaliki , Democrático and homosexuals.
 Putin's time in power , just be enough to ensure that we were able to see the destruction of modern Europe and the U.S. ( in their current national and composition, and their traditional way of life ) and u have time to do this right conclusions to mature as a nation and finally then begin to live your mind and go your own way , not trying to try on Russia European or American , even brand , but pretty poedennye eaten and out of fashion coats .

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от artcol

Article Pastukhov about the revolution.

Article hurt something, right?
See yourself there among Putin's lumpen?