What do you think Sychkov?

[redbor]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy

And she put up and Hammers, and the top lot at an auction of the season at Gelos

Are you sure? Why?
 Exhibited at the Gelos pic a lot, and the second pictures is not, had to borrow a hammer museum?
 On the exposed hammer to 29.09. and Gelos already 25.09 starts.
Where will the leave the goods?
And the size Molotkovsky - 1500h1200. and on Gelos 1020h780, ie
area of 2.25 times less Molotkovsky, while asking the same ... Obviously, different things.
(Unless the seller under the hammer makes a change in a minute).
Most likely - to hammer arrangement on trust, but on Gelos copy n /x, and possibly 1937.
(If not clear meaning in a picture made of small additions)

[аркан]

Sychkov often wrote variations and repetitions of his grandiose works.
What I do not like this, so it is almost complete similarity, which in this author's nobody ever been.
All versions of quite different composition.

[redbor]

Well, not sold at the Gelos

"Author's version of the painting" The collective-farm market. "G.H.m. 1937, 78h102"

And the hammer back in stock:

"pattern Sychkov FV" Kohozny Bazaar 1937.

oil on canvas, 1500h1200. The original "

Perhaps, too, will not buy?
 
It turns out, in vain F. Sychkov many options paintings wrote, no one buys?

[uriart]

redbor, and not to divorce Gelos buyers?

Exposed at home and on the hammer.
Perhaps somewhere and buy!

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от uriart

and not to divorce Gelos buyers?

Gelos such things do not.

[САВВА11]

Сообщение от SergeiSK

Photos from Gelos little "lifeless" is likely retouched in Photoshop.
And that is Sychkov, at first glance, no doubt. On the second, too.
Picture of the seller if it read:
If the auction work will not be sold, it is ready to talk about their purchase .

Response to the proposals regarding the acquisition: Painting is sold, but left in Gelos on the commission to 5 ml. Rub On .. "hammer" is sold she is. In the first announcement of the data on the painting were mess, (the incompetence of the Secretary, sorry !!!). ready for discussion.

[redbor]

Сообщение от SAVVA11

In the first announcement of the data on the painting were mess, (the incompetence of the Secretary, sorry !!!). ready for discussion.

SAVVA11! Please be more specific.
what data to make a mess?
What is the price right?
 
What is the size of your picture, and how she really looks like?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

redbor, and that clarify?
In Gelos upon acceptance of the auction staff themselves rulntkoy obmeryayut thing, then it yourself and take pictures for posting on its website.
And the price has already been called:

Сообщение от "SAVVA11

Gelos in the commission of 5 ml. rub.

Minusnete gelosovskie%%will receive an amount that will satisfy the seller.

[redbor]

It is clear, on the back does not count.
A picture, as yet, centimeters?

If you made a mess of the Secretary, then probably in Gelos.

Or on the hammer, too - the secretary is?

About the "original" too mess up?

How to correctly now called?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от redbor

It is clear, but how many yet, centimeters?

If you made a mess of the Secretary, then probably in Gelos.

Or on the hammer, too - the secretary there?

Messed up on Hammers Secretary seller for Gelos Secretary shall not painting at auction.


Added after 57 seconds
On the Hammers You place all the information.

Сообщение от SAVVA11

In the first announcement of the data on the painting were mess, (the incompetence of the Secretary, sorry !!!).