Artist Alexey Golovin

[I-V]

One outspoken commercial conjuncture, in my opinion, written by
moreover, not very professional. Sintementalnost girls with
Kotik on the verge of idiocy. Painting specially made for the template
perception of the average citizen.
Another picture is quite leaves, me personally, indifferent.
performance ... nothing makes my eyes stop.
Beauty is not in any of them. I repeat, for me personally.
Abstain from choice, because choice equivalent to the question executioner:
You are to drive needles under his nails, iron or titanium?
There is an antonym: beautiful - ugly. The essence of the painting Gross - ugly. The girl in the painting Zola ... beautiful? No, the impossibly saccharine, nauseating. What made such a hideous creature Gross? - A beautiful painting. What did the girl Ash sugary to loathing? - An ugly painting. There are concepts: good painting and bad. And it is - the only criterion. There is a painting - there is beauty (if it does not matter what or who is in the picture, even Quasimodo). No painting - no beauty (even in the picture itself Apollo). You abstained. But sooner or later you will have to make choices. Of course, if you want to be called an artist.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[U_Z]

[QUOTE=\\

[Евгений]

And this - the only criterion. [/QUOTE]
.. A judge who ...?
------------------------
Alex Golovin, a professional artist with a beautiful, basic art education .. In any genre of traditional art, he feels confident .. New theme for the art search is another matter, and this can be discussed.
Alex, what is your attitude to this section of art, as Orientalism (the use of motifs and stylistic devices vostochnogoo art and history, stories of the eastern way of life in art)
probyvali to do something or not?

[Yurko]

..
Here we look at the pictures Golovin and see what is Golovin beginning of the XXI century! .. and I say that the pictures weigh them in the wards is 50-60 years of Socialist Realism candid ...

[Кирилл Сызранский]

So what? Every year! Thousands!

Sort of.

[Игорь Гурьев]

[QUOTE=\\

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[QUOTE=\\

[I-V]

Right, of course ... Still, let's agree: everyone who participated in the discussion of works Golovin - judges. No, rather than judges and juries). In the end, Mr. Golovin, issued its own creativity to the discussion forum. So he was interested in the opinion of all who are watching and writing. Apparently, he expects, and certain verdict. And what could be a verdict on this case? Only this: The Art of whether what Mr. Golovin does or blundering. Bring the same sentence is not our problem Although, in the case of the artists last vedikt worse pyubogo sentence. and nothing for him it will not. However, to make the most equitable verdict is absolutely necessary to move to the consideration of such evidence as the preference of Mr. Golovin in the world of painting of the twentieth HH1vv. However, it would be nice to find out what he disliked in her. I think everybody is clear that the great majority for Mr. Golovin names are concentrated in Х1Х and earlier centuries. But what he likes in the twentieth century and ХХ1. For most of us, I suppose, a mystery. We, I think, we do not think the art world in its entirety without these two outstanding centuries (at least I). So, Mr. Golovin, I beg you! Hopefully I will support them.

[Игорь Гурьев]

[QUOTE=\\