"Lyalya naked Viktor Reikhet. Who knows where she is?

[sini4ka]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Hang home, "someone else's naked aunt"?

HeG. Would agree. Not so much because of the nudity - there would be hunters found - but because of the sight. She too stares from the display.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от sinitza

She too stares from the display.

Perhaps the model would lie with his back to the viewer, for example, would not be a portrait of all this work well, though naked ladies, it would have looked more "interior".
But now ... I repeat: I like the dealer would not take over this thing.

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

And who would buy this picture? Hang the home, "someone else's naked aunt?
Would Serov or cabin there any by the end of XIX - beg. XX vv.-another thing: the name, museum piece!
And here? One nakedness, God forgive me.

Well, yes, pouprazhnyatsya over defenseless Lyalya - why not ?
And now make an effort to sing the chorus of praise psalms Freud and Abramovich!!

[Mona]

Well-known and has already become poppy work of Freud.

Cyril Syzran
Common. Dealers arte do not work with artistic value, but with the commodity. They do not sell art, and merchandise. The word "art" "art" is used to cover up that it was easier vtyuhat. Well, as everywhere else - that the toilet paper, that the sausage that the paintings are sold by the same laws - this is an old man, Keynes overlooked.
 That's why you do not want to come to this forum, where the emphasis on the marketability of harm to the artistic quality - and it is natural and understandable. Tovar do some people, art - others. They have different interests and ideas.

Added after 3 minutes

Сообщение от Mihail

An interesting topic, a pleasure to write to Irina, Mona, thank you, I think the picture in a private Tretyakov Gallery in St. Petersburg ...
It is a pity that Kirill Syzransky not appreciate the work, but it is an undeniable masterpiece, of course, the image is not a qualitative - otdalennnoe representation gives ..

Michael! glad you. Well коменты "experts" here, eh?

About what will come of the venture with a portrait of Irina - if that will tell you. I will write to them that you agree to write a portrait. And what if there were going to negotiate their own

[Mihail]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

I-dealer, I appreciate things as a potential commodity.
Such a thing I could not sell, I think, never.

Actually V. Reikhet wrote a lot of naked, he is master of this genre, almost all of them are sold and resold to dealers, not once .... do not think that you will not be able to sell ..... there is some mystery .... in your rejection of the genre nude, nude, this is the hardest part of painting, note, very few people cope with such a genre, many of the great writing naked body ... Just take Rembrandt .... . or Renoir - too naked body .....

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Mihail

here there is a mystery .... in your rejection Nude

Not in my and my clients.
I Sell "features a bald, I can, I just do not sit down to anything or falling.
I trade her.
I must first buy, but "on horseradish goat accordion, and I have to buy a notorious gemmor?
There was a woman trouble, a woman bought a pig ... (c)

[Mihail]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Not in my and my clients.
I Sell "features a bald, I can, I just do not sit down to anything or falling.
I trade her.
I must first buy, but "on horseradish goat accordion, and I have to buy a notorious gemmor? These golovnyaki on level ground? Why?
Three days of march, three days without sleep
For the sake of a few lines in the newspaper ... (c)
No, just keep him.
There was a woman trouble, a woman bought a pig ... (c)

Your motives are clear to me, but vobschem I'm not talking about that, not about sales, there is a kind of unfaithfulness of your assessments, for example talking about the paintings of such masters as B. Reikhet - "not getting" not very nice ... We say if you compare it tvorchesvo for example with the work Stozharov, the latter would be, really, to lose .... I can compete with anyone ...

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Mihail

Interesting topic, a pleasure to write to Irina,

I would be happy!

[Mona]

Сообщение от Eugene

You have reported this was the second day write ..

And why have you come?

Why come? See the beginning of this post.

What? not?

for these 2 days discovered a new one:
Shemyakin-so is no relation to Socialist Realism does not (and why?)
- That the Socialist Realism - that bjaka shit and nobody wants and no-sales (and the fact that now - the beauty of that?)

-here is unaware that socialist realism - it is the only style (world) 20 century and belongs to the vanguard

-here they told me to read books that really bad (and this forum is useful?)



- And many others. another boring list

[Причал]

Сообщение от Mona

Why did she come? See the beginning of this post.

Looked.

They gave you some very sensible and absolutely free advice:

In particular, contact the artist. Even given its coordinates. Why is the artist? Because he has a right to know where his picture on the "droit" (there is a point at the copyright).

It is reasonable to ask you about the reasons for such interest to find a picture. And it was another valid point about the low commercial interest in the work among the masses. Explain to you why.
Prompted that under such conditions have portrayed a very high chance to redeem the work inexpensively.