Mikhail Shemyakin: on modern art

[Сима]

Сообщение от Mona

necessary (if anything) works to provide the Agency for Investigative Journalism "Federal Reporter", supported by RIA <FederalPress>. This is its structure and SF

 And that we, my colleagues, Shemyakin? I have not opened, for some reason. Perhaps someone explain to me, and I can not understand why he gathers a collection of noses. ears. mice, etc. What pathos?

[LCR]

Сообщение от Sim

And that we, my colleagues, Shemyakin? I have not opened, for some reason. Perhaps someone explain to me, and I can not understand why he gathers a collection of noses. ears. mice, etc. What pathos?

And he probably, as we, in otgadayki plays

[Сима]

LCR, but no, he seems to have its netlenku doing. Ie Look what the nose is better suited to his new creation and uses. This I already know. I thought, maybe even some kind of important task at this museum in the castle. There, all the drawers. boxes with strange noses, and mice ...
And we are guessing at Turchin at lectures, I remember playing. Twentieth century. Dark. They put a slide. Turchin: Turn over, please. Overturns. Turchin: Another turn, please. Overturns. Turchin: Right to left turn, please. Overturns. Silence. Dark same. We are feeling completely bewildered. again: turn, please. (In our dark eyes, the result - worse than ever).
Silence. Doing nothing, the options no longer exist. And begins: Periodization of analytical Cubism .... It is not surprising that the exam did not come, he understood that tear!

[Причал]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

I do not understand ...

And remember the book "Kukarskikh on the other side of prosperity", so I believe that you remember

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Berth

Do you remember the book "Kukarskikh on the other side of prosperity", so I believe that you remember

I do not know what you are saying.

[Veronic]

Mona, here in general, too, can open topics you're interested in art and they do not necessarily have to be with a commercial slant, although it is much interesting.

[Причал]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

I do not know what you say.

This book was reprinted three times and, in my opinion, all it knew. She was one of the few sources of knowledge about what is happening in the rotting West in the arts. With the corresponding commentary of the Marxist-Leninist character, of course.
But, unlike textbooks marksitsko-Leninist aesthetics, where we looked for damnable quotes from some Adorno and Freud, it was still a lot of pictures.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

wharf, no, I was reading a similar book, "Modernism. Analysis and criticism of the main directions.", The 73rd, with 169 illustrations from Munch and Kirchner to Oppenheim and Meurs.

[Причал]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

wharf, no, I was reading a similar book, but "Modernism. Analysis and criticism of the main directions"., the 73rd, the with 169 illustrations from Munch and Kirchner to Oppenheim and Meurs.

But I was not so. Apparently there is more about the purely visual arts.
And Kukarkin described all performances, and film, and the phenomena of television and advertising, and comic books, and to have the entire fig.

But it is not important.

I have this to the fact that useful information can be found in the strangest frame "So far

[Сима]

Cyril Syzransky, ie you had a book! But in fact they were 2. But the second still much later. Not Kukarskikh and Kukarkin. Politizdat, very well remember. And the first we have the exam at Turchin ready, it is true that the exam did not.