27 Antique Salon

[Pavel]

Do not participate. Due to the fact that these activities are not designed for the general public and the costs are covered by lease platy.Mesta there expensive, but must pay the artists. I believe that everything is already paid.
Buying Art is not related to wages, because apart from the pleasure of painting a person gets a chance to get rich in the near future or not. What was good the Soviet Union is the vastness of its market. He is big in Russia, but no less than Ukraine and from Ukraine is less, but in Europe the market is small and already busy. Art market.

[color="# 666686"]Posted 15 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Konstantin

27 Salon - one of the most pseschaemyh over the past three years. I was there a TV channel a tormented: shy:, leading them through the cabin with the comments. Specifically asked them to come to 12-00, at the beginning, until the people there to calmly shoot. Filming took 4 hours and re-starting with 14-30 people have actively gone, and from 15-00 was a very difficult and it is on weekdays. Such attendance can not remember. So the interest is even there.
Regarding what is better - modern or antiques? Even the question - wrong. Is Art Moscow, will be Art-Manege. Paul you are there involved? That's where interesting to hear your opinion, but then all of Monet yes Cézanne.

The history of art does not depend on the country but in France was a center of learning and not to repeat mistakes. Monet and Cezanne were at the beginning of the modern artist relations - an amateur trader.
All Arta - a cheap attempt vtyuhat someone else and someone else to push.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 16 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Ha, and anyone interested in Pupkin and Zarupkin?

I do not know of.