Christie's auction will present a record number of Russian lots

[ранжер]

Сообщение от uriart

Dear Ranzher!
But some where you can buy you a book called "Watercolors by Vladimir Gau"?

Dearest Yuri

  referred to the album was released a gallery 10-15 years ago. During this time, circulation in bookstores and in the gallery broke. Now this book can be purchased on the occasion of second-hand bookstores or at auctions.

[uriart]

ranzher, if And this book is for you, whether it is possible to ask it to output.
The exact name, year and a publishing house.
To request for bukin.sayte.

[Тютчев]

Very easily sold picture Benoit, given that it is painted in 41-Year! For the late Benoit price is very bad. "

Lot 445 Alexandre Benois (1870-1960)
Count Orlov moving off at Gatchina
signed and dated 'Alexandre Benois/1941' (lower left)
pencil, watercolour and gouache on paper
19 ¼ x 20 7 /8 in. (49 x 53 cm.)


Price Realized £ 39,650
($ 62,647)

http://www.christies.com/LotFinder/l...8-bc9400a7c2fa

[AlexanderG]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

Tenders were successful than I expected. Sold for good money for first class objects. I thought everything would be worse.

But I do not understand! Graphic sheet in the manner of hierarchy ???!!! Naturally, this work of Bogolyubov irrelevant! It has no relation even to the manner of hierarchy! But bought! And for good money, by the way! I do not blame ... Who knew, explain ...

Lot 296 Manner of Aleksei Bogoliubov
Coming ashore
signed in Cyrillic 'A Bogo .... ov' (lower right)
pencil and watercolour, heightened with white, on paper laid down on paper
8 ¾ x 12 ¾ in. (22.2 x 32.4 cm.)

Price Realized £ 12,500
($ 19,987)

http://www.christies.com/LotFinder/l...8-bc9400a7c2fa

Takoe opisanie raboty ne oznachaet, chto eto rabota Bogoliubova. Auktsion vsio sdelal pravil'no, v sootvetstvii s zakonom, no ih iazyk izlozeniia nado ponimat '.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от AlexanderG

Takoe opisanie raboty ne oznachaet, chto eto rabota Bogoliubova. Auktsion vsio sdelal pravil'no, v sootvetstvii s zakonom, no ih iazyk izlozeniia nado ponimat '.

Thank you, AlexanderG, but I just understand perfectly. I do not understand the other two things. First, why this picture is attributed to «Manner of Aleksei Bogoliubov»?! Nothing to do with Alexei Bogolyubov I do not see! Secondly, I do not understand the price! The picture went for $ 19.987! Agree that $ 20,000 for work in «Manner of Aleksei Bogoliubov», which even can not call itself, it is too! Well, OK $ 1,000 or $ 2,000, but $ 20,000! This somehow does not fit in my head ...

http://www.christies.com/LotFinder/l...8-bc9400a7c2fa

[AlexanderG]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

Thanks, AlexanderG, but I just understand perfectly. I do not understand the other two things. First, why this picture is attributed to «Manner of Aleksei Bogoliubov»?! Nothing to do with Alexei Bogolyubov I do not see!

Navernoe galerie Popoff podskazal .
A esli auktsion ne nesiot za eto otvetstvennosti, to i. ....

Secondly, I do not understand the price! The picture went for $ 19.987! Agree that $ 20,000 for work in «Manner of Aleksei Bogoliubov», which even can not call itself, it is too! Well, OK $ 1,000 or $ 2,000, but $ 20,000! This somehow does not fit in my head ...

http://www.christies.com/LotFinder/l...8-bc9400a7c2fa

Navernoe kto-to ponadeialsia.
U nas v NZ byl hudoznik C. Goldie, a odin izvestnyi zuk ego poddelyval. Osobenno horosho poluchalas 'podpis'. Stilisticheski - ves'ma otdalionno. On prodal mnozestvo etih kartin i sketchei, a potom popal v tiur'mu. Posle vyhoda on ofitsial'no pomenial imia i familiiu na C. Goldie i prodolzal tu ze deiatel'nost ', no teper' beznakazanno.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от AlexanderG

Navernoe kto-to ponadeialsia.
U nas v NZ byl hudoznik C. Goldie, a odin izvestnyi zuk ego poddelyval. Osobenno horosho poluchalas 'podpis'. Stilisticheski - ves'ma otdalionno. On prodal mnozestvo etih kartin i sketchei, a potom popal v tiur'mu. Posle vyhoda on ofitsial'no pomenial imia i familiiu na C. Goldie i prodolzal tu ze deiatel'nost ', no teper' beznakazanno.

In what could hopefully!

The picture certainly in time, but in quality and style can not possibly be the work of the hierarchy. Rather Bronnikov or someone else ...
 
Here's the real timetable Alexei Bogolyubov: