How to invest $ 100 000

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Eugene

Personally, my opinion is a good investment: the first Stalinist academics (but only during the 1930-1950gg) ...

Simply, it is interesting to remember predictions ..
From site Leonid Shishkin Gallery
"... The great masters of the Soviet period - is also a promising area for investment. Excellent confirmation of the fact - a classic picture of the Soviet Yuri Pimenov's" The Rape of Europe ", exhibited at the Russian auction Sotheby` s, London (June 2010) with the estimate £ 400-600 thousands. This estimeyt several times greater than the amount for which the product was sold two years ago Leonid Shishkin Gallery ... "
Work sold for £ 433250 (EA)

http://www.shishkin-gallery.ru/auction_20100624.html
-----------------------------------------------
 Pimenov Yuri Ivanovich (1903 - 1977) - Soviet painter and graphic artist, popular artist of USSR, a member of the USSR Academy of Arts.
------------------------------------------------
According to information from the media, now bought a Russian collector, I wonder who? Who has information? write a few words ....
1.Kartina Yuri Pimenov. "Kidnapping of Europe" 87h107 sm.1969 PM

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Eugene

Pimenov Yuri Ivanovich (1903 - 1977) - Soviet painter and graphic artist, popular artist of USSR, a member of the USSR Academy of Arts.

It can hardly be called "the first staliskim academician. He became a full member of the USSR Academy of Arts in 1962, just after in the Khrushchev "thaw".

[Евгений]

[Евгений]

A bit off topic (just beautiful zhivlpis).

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[Wladzislaw]

On investments in print Dali.

[korosteloff]

Eugene, on "The Rape of Europa" Pimenov. I am not convinced the price for this work. For me Pimenov - a fresh, washed and TP. In addition, the buyer from Russia. Our new Russian can and just over a naked woman to buy. So, that is, in my opinion, the "last spike" prices Pimenov. And unjustified.
For such buyers have their own artist - this is Jeff Koons. Foolish, but expensive.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[QUOTE="korosteloff; 1351331] So, that is, in my opinion, the" last spike "prices Pimenov.
And unjustified.
[/QUOTE]

Let's see how it goes [URL="http://sovcom.ru/index.php?category=auction&auctiontype=lot&lot=129 &auction=145"]thing[/URL] Pimenov.

She also has a auction history.

[I-V]

Under the package, I mean a few pictures of several artists.
I think that it is less risky option than a few pictures of one.
For example, at the same salon at the Manege is Cooper, great work
60 000-80 000 Euros. Small for 6000-8000 dollars.
It is a candidate to enter into such a package. [/QUOTE]

Dreaming, after all, always good (and bad for you?), As well as share their dreams with others). So, my mneie: Paul Pepperstein. It is a candidate to enter into such a package. Presented here http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=86351 work, in my opinion, a very high level. So far, it seems, they are available up to 100 000 $, but I think this long. And it is likely that it will take 10 years - 15, and Pepperstein finally and irrevocably be recognized as one of the main representatives of contemporary Russian art. Importantly, he made clear as the creator of the artistic program, which, sooner or later, be sure to be in demand: http://artinvestment.ru/news/exhibit...pperstein.html

[korosteloff]

I-V,
IV, yes, but that, nevertheless, the concept. Working, trying, there are supporters, sympathizers. But the form is not created their own, what I mean? What attachments in this? Something pitiful. Only because of love to fly? Who invests the money for love? There must be a cold calculation and a clear mind. From Conceptual buy Brener. This is the only thing we had. Dollar signs with green paint. Of the formalists - fire (with a thin, long line) and Puzenkov (rubbing). From figurative painting - Ter Oganyan (picture in picture), the same Puzenkov (computer). This is something of a Russian on a global level. I and my offer: the binocular image and paint with color.

Added after 22 minutes
Cyril Syzransky, Yes, even that there will not persuade me nothing. I'm talking about the "eternal truths" of investment. And truth, these are: the form must be above the image, and it, in turn, higher than the content. Pimenov - the content, it is not written in a new cylinder. And just so you can determine the formula for the fine artist - imagine how he would have written a cylinder. For example, Picasso - associative, Malevich - with a black shadow, Matisse - flat and so on. Discoveries of a very few. Even less - in the form. They can be reduced to the spot and the line: Fontana (a hole and scrape), Agam (unchanged), and so on. Incidentally, the same can be bought in Agama Gallart about, very cheap. For his level. Circulation, of course. Not for a solid museum, but a private collection. And certainly not a fake. I would be deluged with all schools, throwing Shishkin and Vasnetsov. Nobody ever buys art because of her beauty. Beauty can be copied to any elementary street artists. Only the opening and only original. There is this question - no deals. Let the artist cares about that his paintings were small, public, cataloged and difficult poddelyvaemy. How to deal with Picasso and Dali, means that they - ignoramuses.