On the strange influence on the art

[mezon]

Сообщение от fross

In the cartoon was not a crocodile, but he was a baby elephant.

  Well, it's not a lie In the main, I did not deceive you - these were different animals. With regard to science, I believe, that lies in it a lot. However, despite this she is moving forward just because moves in the search, but not worth contemplating. So I propose a walk in the mountains, the hills ... the waves ... You will see with your own eyes and no one deceive you is not going to. However, affected your perspective suggests that in science a lot of subjective and it is so for the reason that science - this is how human language and art.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

mezon, I did not understand, and science got to do with it? Art and Science?
Craft
I put the foot of the art:
I became a craftsman: fingers
Highlight obedient, dry fluency
And loyalty to his ear. Sounds slaying,
Music I razyal like a corpse. Believed
I algebra harmony. Then
Already dare, versed in science,
Indulge bliss creative dreams. (c)

[mezon]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

mezon, I did not understand, and science got to do with it? Art and Science?
Craft
I put the foot of the art:
I became a craftsman: fingers
Highlight obedient, dry fluency
And loyalty to his ear. Sounds slaying,
Music I razyal like a corpse. Believed
I algebra harmony. Then
Already dare, versed in science,
Indulge bliss creative dreams. (c)

Well, of course! You have answered this question:
Believed
I algebra harmony. Then
Already dare, versed in science,
Indulge bliss creative dreams.

  "Then have ...", but without it you will not sing freely overcoming doubt in my heart ...

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от mezon

Well, of course! You have answered this question

Well, suppose I have not answered, "and cited the words of Pushkin's Salieri's" little tragedy ". Words, incidentally, a negative hero. : D

[Amateur]

I think that the evolution of fine art is not influenced by physics and other sciences themselves, and their practical results. It is unlikely then the artist versed in the best physical description of the picture of the world such as the theory of relativity, quantum mechanics, etc. But the emergence of photography in the XIX century, in fact, deprive artists work "on the exact image of reality: the picture has done much more accurately than any artist. However, the impressions (impressions) from seen picture, then black and white, is able to transfer to a much lesser extent than painting. Hence - etyudnaya manner of the Impressionists, and their experiments with color (which had begun at Delacroix). Artist's keen eye noticed and perspective distortion of photographic images by comparison with visual perception (Gauguin expressed on this issue clearly, Cezanne - his paintings). Emergence in the early XX century, color photography, with its first imperfect color causing cravings for pure colors in the painting (eg, Vlaminck, Marquet, Dufy). Stereoscopic picture with unsurpassed realism (born almost simultaneously with the usual, but experienced a real boom at the turn of XIX - XX centuries, by the way, it was a great admirer of Leo Tolstoy) resulted in the desire of artists to "renounce the visibility, an image refracted through their consciousness of reality (futurism, cubism, surrealism), as well as non-objective painting. All this, of course, only a plausible hypothesis.

Сообщение от mezon

I'm not in the least inclined to mysticism and do not intend to look at these amazing coincidences some otherworldly effect. But some incomprehensibly immense transformation of the human spirit in the creation and understanding of the arts (music, literature, painting) and in the constructions of science (physics, biology, psychology) really are synchronous and they probably are interrelated.

I was about 15 years to hit and has since been etched in the memory of the painting Burliuk "Atom" from the magazine "America" somewhere in 1970 (the painting itself is in the Metropolitan-Museum). She wrote, as I recall, in purple tones, dated 1911 year, but it shows the (conditional, of course) and the orbital electrons and the nucleus of an atom. But the orbital model of the atom was first proposed by Niels Bohr and justified only in 1912! How ...? I have long and so far unsuccessfully been looking for a reproduction of this painting and would be very grateful to those who have laid it on the forum.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Amateur

crashed into memory the painting Burliuk "Atom" from the magazine "America" somewhere in 1970 (the painting itself is in the Metropolitan-Museum). She wrote, as I recall, in purple tones, dated 1911 year, but it shows the (conditional, of course) and the orbital electrons and the nucleus of an atom.

I tend to think that this work is only dated 11 th year. It is written, it may be much later.
I just do not quite understand how the work of this year hit the United States. He it to Siberia during the Civil drove, drove to Vladivostok, then with her in Japan and the U.S. left. Even more, it still in the 11 th was a poet, though they learned while with Mayakovsky in MUZHVZ, where they and drove in 14-m.
No, not an option.
Nothing nor does he drove, his hands were two children with his wife, think about them.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Amateur

I have long and so far unsuccessfully been looking for a reproduction of this painting and would be very grateful to those who have laid it on the forum.

This picture?
No, probably ...

[Amateur]

No, Kirill, is not it. That was a purple-black color scheme, the center was clear to see the nucleus, and around him, in part, his touching (which the atoms does not happen) - some kind of radial and azimuthal layered substance, with layers from each other separated by black lines with some with white piping. So, as I remember.