Exhibition VLADEY

[bykinist]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Yes, and it krupnovato for the kitchen, even for St. Petersburg - 148h208.
<! - ~ 1 ~ -> No?

Just for St. Petersburg at the time.

Сообщение от Irina

employee Turkina belt, which has a provenance of its collection, to put it mildly, is not so good.

Well, if said A, say B. ..

[Ирина Ивановна]

A. Just enough and painting at an auction on the wrong dishes. If a customer when purchasing the product developed a habit of always interested in the procedure to the seller (if it is not the author ) documents the ownership and to take copies of them , + check if possible, the data from the author or his heirs , then it is not true b .

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от Irina

is always interested in the procedure to the seller (if it is not the author) documents on the ownership

For example the owner bought the painting from the artist directly, which document he can present?

[Ирина Ивановна]

Сообщение от Konstantin

For example the owner bought the painting from the artist directly, which document he can present ?

Of course , even if a contract of sale, a receipt for the money. In general, all spelled out in the Civil Code .

" Part Four of the Civil Code legislator refuses the concept of" publishing agreement " and provides for two types of contracts, which may be made in respect of any of the results of intellectual activities (including the works of science , literature and art) : the contract for the alienation of the exclusive rights to the product and license agreement granting the right to use the work "

[олег назаров]

Сообщение от Irina

Of course, even if a contract of sale.

And what is this all about?
Is someone doubts the authenticity?

Ovcharenko, if only that your auction will not take ...
it will not Shovel <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[олег назаров]

Сообщение от Konstantin; 2803711 "

For example the owner bought the painting from the artist directly, which document he can present ?

In general, if you really want to have the document is the most simple and effective form is notarized statement . " I declare that ..... ..... signature"
I have repeatedly made ​​these for their customers.

[color="#666686 " ]Added after 8 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Irina ; 2803831 "

I assume that when directly Inala recently asked whether Turkina bought his paintings in his collection , or maybe he gave it to her himself , the answer was negative. That's just such cases of obvious differences and should be documented purchase or donation .
It is not clear why she was buying his work for you to organize an exhibition in the early 90s , if by that time had known him personally ?

this is some stupid Inal and Victor agreed with Olesya for me personally to acquire the "Foxes " and "jumping the TV" given that we are all friends for 25 years or about how my dividends if it was not for you this .

[color="#666686 " ]Added after 11 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Irina ; 2803831 "

that when directly asked recently Inal

Who asked and why ... this is just ridiculous . do not invent .

[Ирина Ивановна]

The mandatory notarization of the law does not require that you can do without it.

If you personally witnessed, it's okay, you believe it.

But still, not making this up.
I admit that I have not correctly understood the information.

[олег назаров]

Сообщение от Irina ; 2802461 "

which has a provenance of its collection , to put it mildly , is not so good.

 And that in itself is not so good Olesya ... yes she has a 2 in Inala purchased from the author of the exhibition organized by me in the early 90s .. and what is wrong?
The fox is put up for auction was made much later /

 

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky ; 2802491 "

Yes, and it krupnovato for the kitchen, even for St. Petersburg - 148h208 .

  that work in question 100x140 and hung it and hanging in the living room.
 
.

[Ирина Ивановна]

Сообщение от Oleg Nazarov

And what exactly have Olesya not so good ... yes she has a 2 in Inala purchased from the author of the exhibition organized by me in the early 90s .. and what is wrong?
The fox is put up for auction was made much later /
.

I assume that when directly Inala recently asked whether Turkina bought his paintings in his collection , or maybe he gave it to her himself , the answer was negative. That's just such cases of obvious differences and should be documented purchase or donation .
It is not clear why she was buying his work for you to organize an exhibition in the early 90s , if by that time had known him personally?

[color="#666686 " ]Added after 2 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Oleg Nazarov

And what is this all about? Is someone doubts the authenticity?
Ovcharenko , if only that your auction will not take ... it will not Shovel <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

On the contrary, the emphasis is on unconditional authenticity + crystal clear stories .

[bykinist]

Сообщение от Konstantin

there and the prices are very reasonable way .

All the same, you got excited call rates acceptable.
Aref graphics (Lot 26) - well, the size is not small, but do not tell that big. Work dull and state so-so. Price: 675,000-810,000 p . + 20 %buyer's premium + ticket for the pre-auction exhibition . Muscovites and hear about him have not. And why is this item marked with an asterisk ? Is "droit de suite" not only applies to the now - living authors? (correct if wrong)
A " line" Bulatov (lot 6) ? 675,000-900,000 p . + Etc. Help! And in the abstract and Ivanov and Shishkin and even dragged Vrubel .
But Nesterov (lot 72 ), a good job and many times cheaper than the family. Probably another " gift" on the secondary market <! - ~ 6 ~ ->
And I wonder who he is , SHOMOL Schwartz (Lot 42) ? ))))