Fake for Gelos

[Сима]

dedulya37

     Thanks to "sheep", yet vstryat try again. Exhibited remarkable miniatures you argue with your indignation. What's to argue, quite different "compositional richness" was a master in the autumn of 1969, not to mention the motives and themes.
     This in my 1 and 2 positions were different. Not questioning the need to combat untidiness sellers. Just the term "fake" this situation does not match. above. So you are my motivation still misunderstood. And to fight my long arms drooped, struggled for 15 years.
Here is where the problem is: it is this image someone has drawn, tried, dear heart motif embodied nature, and the name is not set (or washed away?). And thank God that did not sign Stozharov, but only "attributed". Thus a picture has a chance to return someday to the name of the author. In my expert practice was the case when the work of a little known artist signed the names of three different masters: Korovin, Dobuzhinsky and Sudeikin. Thank God, a pencil and on the substrate. Worse, when the oil in the oil, and you znaesch that just do not Sudeikin. And what to do with the work of something. They have taken away and sold, and my heart aches. For someone who was there to Sudeikina and signature washed. Its something like return. So in this light, the case "is attributed Stozharov" just very gentle.