Exhibition Giorgio De Chirico in Paris

[LCR]

Сообщение от IrinaC

LCR, why you have such an attitude to them, tell me, svp

Because I, Ira, I love painting, but they have - except Magritte, who all managed to create some onirichesky world - painting and does not smell, one vymorochenny, strained anecdote. Four-flusher and hacks.

No wonder over them made fun of all and sundry
However, in commercial terms with nimh can only take an example - this is an area they had a real talent.

Dali, for example, in 1920-ies. went to Freud - to show their products and the endorsement of psychoanalytic cases Wizard - for businesses that would be very bad, just could be 30-40 per cent price increase. But the Fakir was drunk, and the focus and podsoznankoy failed: Freud dryly explained the mustachioed smart aleck that he is looking for a subconscious (and sometimes is) a normal painting, but salvadorovskie invention he was not interested.

[qwerty]

Сообщение от LCR

Because I, Ira, I love painting, but they have - except Magritte, who all managed to create some onirichesky world - painting and does not smell, one vymorochenny, strained anecdote. Four-flusher and hacks.

Dear Nana, You are still very subjective. Delvaux, Picabia, Dominguez, Tanguy, Matta just do not deserve such words. And the best work so unloved you like Dali's "Discovery of America by Columbus" or "Hunting for tuna, I think differently as masterpieces can not be named.

[fross]

Сообщение от LCR

Well, and that this will change?
I, in fact, proceed from the hypothesis that this period Chirico - the best.
Hence, the best period Chirico incomparably better than all that baked these psychos - and this is an axiom in the proofs, it does not need )))

And the conclusion of these hypotheses with the axioms you have done paradoxical:

Сообщение от LCR

Surrealists for soap!