Your opinion?

[I-V]

Сообщение от polimpa84; 1549633"

I wrote that made a forensic examination, and ultraviolet and infrokrasny and x-rays and a canvas and paint 1915-1930, under it there is nothing

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Well, maybe a copy of the time, but hardly Chagall, he had no reason to do this was not so expensive then the cost of his paintings.

I will immediately say: I'm also more than sure that this is not Chagall. The picture is not "breathe", painting is dry, with no "depth" that, in my opinion, for Chagall's absolutely not the case. Nevertheless, in fairness, I think it necessary to recall this fact:

"In the spring of 1923 Paul Cassirer, a Berlin publisher and gallery owner, artist offers to publish the book" My Life "with author's illustrations. Chagall accepts the offer and plunged into the development of art prints. And at the end of summer the same year, comes a letter from his old friend in Paris: "Come, you know. Vollard's waiting for you. "

Back in Paris, Chagall reveals another loss: most of the paintings by which he is now known, left in the "Hive" eight years ago lost. He's going with the forces and thoroughly, restoring the memory, pictures and reporuduktsiyam, wrote part of the re-works of the first Paris period: "Birthday", "I and the Village," "Over Vitebsk" and others. "

http://www.marc-chagall.ru/

Searching the Internet, I something from this list found. With no time to sort dates, so that the sequence may not be respected. In images number number 7, 10 (especially 10) I'm not absolutely sure - correct me please if it is not Chagall.

[Wladzislaw]

I-V,


and why all these platitudes and internet foty? ...

[I-V]

Сообщение от Wladzislaw

and why all these platitudes and internet foty? ...

Any banality should be considered, at least to him afterwards to come back.