Help determine the cost of painting

[sergejnowo]

Сообщение от Samvel

I think the price is today, 5000-7000 $

Сообщение от Samvel; 1340521"

today for it do not pay even 300

Everything is clear in principle .....
However, in a market where pricing takes place, it does not happen.
The price on the open market develops only on the basis of comparison of supply and demand.
If there is no demand, then called the amount of $ 5000-7000 a series of castles in the air of Baron Munchausen.
She was in a "rush hour" and no longer exists and can no longer exist.

And work is really good.

[artcol]

Сообщение от sergejnowo

Everything is clear in principle .....
However, in a market where pricing takes place, it does not happen.
The price on the open market develops only on the basis of comparison of supply and demand.
If there is no demand, then called the amount of $ 5000-7000 a series of castles in the air of Baron Munchausen.
She was in a "rush hour" and no longer exists and can no longer exist.

And work is really good.

Do not forget about the art dealer, to-e is especially true in Russia. The price for a work of art consists of 2 parts: the objective of (let's say the cost of: education, talent, historical and social background) + subjective part (Wishlist buyer /seller to maintain a certain market background /mode). Yes, now situation is not much (that is, part 2 goes to zero), but in fact there and the first part quite significant.
And swing the pendulum the other way. I would, for example, bought a work of art my field of vision without hesitation for the money. But they are not

[sergejnowo]

Сообщение от "artcol

I would, for example, bought a work of art my field of vision without hesitation for the money.
But they do not

please tell me, why did you pay 5000 - 7000 $ for the work that you liked, but the market for it offers only $ 500 (Antique), or let's say $ 1500 by someone else?

[artcol]

Сообщение от sergejnowo

please tell me, why did you pay 5000 - 7000 $ for the work that you liked, but the market for it offers only $ 500 (Antique), or let's say $ 1500 by someone else?

No, I spoke only on the option with the artists of my field of view (the late, eat-no), and, accordingly, but acted as a collector. A Antique - he's reseller, dealer, had a different approach to the purchase price. Need to look for a collector. And then the estimate announced by Samvel become a realistic price. That's what I wanted to say.

[Самвел]

Сообщение от artcol; 1340871"

The price of a free market develops only on the basis of matching supply and demand.

We're not talking about market products or services, but there really is demand creates supply, but here this should not be, but rather, offers generate demand. Invited any bullshit, whether it's art, teart, movies, music. Go to the book store and you'll see on the shelves, at eye level all the glossy production (waste paper), if we ikusstve will be guided by demand, then there will be trouble (although it is already here), today shows that ikusstvo contrary to its purpose, shoved in this process (demand creates supply)

Сообщение от sergejnowo; 1340851"

please tell me, why did you pay 5000 - 7000 $ for the work that you liked, but the market for it offers only $ 500 (Antique), or let's say $ 1500 by someone else?

 Anyone who offers a $ 500 calculates at least $ 5000. I say again that sell special forums, this is a mistake, you can love to confess, to show, discuss and so on. With regard to implementation, though, would have several works in Photography, Lvfoto@lanet.lv, or e-mail form, then we can offer.

Сообщение от sergejnowo; 1340751"

She was in a "rush hour" and no longer exists and can no longer exist.

 Here just do not agree, but rather the contrary, what today is the demand (it needs the most part), then here it will not suschevstvovat, and such works will only rosti in value. Yes, some real color out there for $ 5000, tired of this now that the gloss has orgomny demand, but even the paint today's time, something ill, they have absorbed all the negative current colors.

[sergejnowo]

Сообщение от Samvel

if we ikusstve will be guided by demand, then there will be trouble

true evil, but you speak for the art of today.
In this case, the artist died in 2008, the work of 1993, certainly not today, and history - there is supply and demand.

Сообщение от Samvel; 1341031"

sell at special forums, this is a mistake

absolutely agree.

Сообщение от Samvel

such works will only rosti in price

do not agree with the categorical view.
To me, God forbid, let the growing, but growth in iron guarantee to give is not necessary.
The history of the last 200 - 300 years have shown otherwise.

[artcol]

Сообщение от sergejnowo

The history of the last 200 - 300 years have shown the opposite.

I think I work with such parameters as this genre Chizhonkova all the rules?
Or am I mistaken?

[ANTIK]

Сообщение от artcol

No, I spoke only on the option with the artists of my field of view (the late, eat-no), and, accordingly, but acted as a collector. A Antique - he's reseller, dealer, had a different approach to the purchase price. Need to look for a collector. And then the estimate announced by Samvel become a realistic price. That's what I wanted to say.

You wrote that I resell the picture? example of lead can follow any responses?

[artcol]

Сообщение от ANTIK

You have written that I re-sell the pictures?
example of lead can follow any responses?

Examples of what?
Why give them?
Not selling, so I made a mistake, correct.

Have you seen it I?
Seen?

[Самвел]

Сообщение от ANTIK

You wrote that I re-sell the pictures?
example of lead can follow any responses?

 
The fact that you are buying different things, if only the picture was old and finished, there's no direction or period of your purchases.
No need to see or have some facts, something should have known.