Minister of Culture proposed to amend the law on public procurement

[SergeiSK]

Culture Minister Alexander Avdeev proposed changes to the law on public procurement, RIA Novosti reported. His proposals, presented at the hearings in the Public Chamber, designed to ensure that this law does not interfere with the culture, did not interfere with the creator of intellectual activity, but it helped. "
According to the minister, the law on public procurement in its current form creates obstacles in the activities of cultural institutions. "We have two choices - either to ask to cancel 94-second law in terms of its application to culture and to fight corruption in other instruments, either to improve the law," - said Avdeev.
In particular, the minister did four-point proposal: to prohibit the public use "of personal data of persons who sell their works in state museums; hold closed competition for insurance and copies of valuable objects away from the law mention of the fact that the advantage in the competition given small businesses as well as large businesses, forged under the Small to get the order "and also to cancel the tenders for the restoration. "A lot of raids in the restoration, all know about it", - quotes Avdeeva agency.
Avdeev also proposed the introduction of state guarantees for holding exhibitions of foreign museums in Russia. "Of all the countries 'seven', only Russia has no government guarantees," - said the minister. According to Proposition Avdeev, state guarantees have to be 90 percent of the insurable value of the exhibition.
In addition, the culture minister reiterated his desire for the construction of the depositary for the Moscow Kremlin Museums. According to Interfax, he asked members of the Public Chamber to support the Kremlin Museums and noted that the best solution would be to build depository for Borovitsky hill, but on another project.
Previously, Avdeev said that another acceptable option would be the dispensation of the depositary in the building "commissariat" warehouses on Zubovsky Boulevard.
(Lenta.Ru)
It was curious to hear examples of "raiding restoration".

[Любознательный]

By and large, the law № 94-FZ of 21.07.05 (On placing orders for goods, works and services for state and municipal needs) was initially flawed and was not satisfied with state customers, nor gospostavschikov. Several times subjected to the law change was introduced administrative liability. However, it is not in any way save the placement of orders from corruption.
Certainly, this section of law requires a change, but not in the way proposed by the Minister.
According to the majority of customers and suppliers, specificity requires the separation of supply (of goods, services, construction and culture).
What is happening today - a monstrously corrupt.
For the recognition of FAS (Federal Antimonopoly Service) component of the corruption in state procurement in the range of 10%. In reality, it begins of 30%. Averaged permissible to consider the order of 50%. Almost the entire amount of the budget goes through a state procurement.

Officials generally require the repeal of the law, they are pleasant and useful to procure at its own discretion in their firms (paintings - from his hand artists). Holes in the law allows them to do it today, but the law establishes penalties for violations (fines of up to 200 000 rubles). Klnechno this ridiculous amount of fines, when the amount of the order of several million.

As you know, after the fires, it was decided to build houses (instead of burnt) outside the law № 94-FZ.
The results have seen all the television: the Vladimir region built homes from chipboard with the installation of insulation from the materials burning in the lame horse. "

Returning to the Minister's proposal, it should be noted its requirement to keep secret the names of authors of paintings acquired by museums. Placing orders for the restoration and copying of producing behind the scenes. In this particular note, the Minister of resentment against small businesses (which means individual and art restorers), not part of the Ministry.

As I am doing the delivery of goods and services (including delivery of musical instruments and other tools and materials) and do not give (so far) services for the restoration, I can not share the practice of raiding in the part of restoration work, but ...

The principle of raiding in public procurement is based on the "match" the winner to send the order to the supplier number 2 (runner-up to the higher price).
Razniitsa between the price of the winner and the price of a new Executive Director (in accordance with the law) may be increased from the price, the stated number 2 in the course of placing an order. Due to this certain delta + surcharges and is replaced with a simultaneous ban Executive for number 1 to participate in the placement of orders for 3 years.

To discredit the singer enough pairs of custom-made articles in the press or on television. Or just burn his shop. As if by accident.
When the supply of goods or services have their own quirks.

[Сима]

Сообщение от "SergeiSK

Previously, Avdeev said that another acceptable option would be the dispensation of the depositary at the" commissariat "warehouses on Zubovsky Boulevard.

They also gave the museum in Moscow.
I was there to "design week" recently.
There are luxurious interiors, not to the depot.

[Самвел]

Сообщение от "SergeiSK

proposal: to prohibit the public use" of personal data of persons who sell their works in public museums "

What, you are talking about in this sentence?

[fabosch]

Сообщение от Samvel

of anything you are talking about in this sentence?

Apparently it comes to keeping secret the names, owners works of art that sold them (the work) in gosmuzey, that is not the author and vladedtsev (which in the particular case may coincide when the product is purchased from the author) . Strictly speaking all the pathos of this thesis lies in the fact that it was impossible to establish, bought the picture from the author or a reseller (collectors, galleries, commission, etc.). All this predstavlyaetya some delirium. But what about the publication in museum catalogs - there are usually reported to the origin of the work. Perhaps, as always, journalists something mess up?