A. Schilder original or not and the cost

[Messer]

1. Author - Andrew Schilder
2. Material and equipment manufacturing - oil on canvas
3. The amount of vertical - 30,0 cm x horizontal - 40,0 cm).
4. Time of creation - 1898
5. Painting is a family of at least 60 years.
6. The original frame was broken, his father as a child)))


Interested in natural value of this work.
Thanks!

[Art-ort]

photo of all the features of this

[Игорь Гурьев]

The picture is pretty, only comrade Schilder did not like.

There are instances when it is so well written?

[lazycat]

Messer,

Good Schilder, it is currently. Only not quite, I understood: only the edge of the duplicated or canvas entirely?

[luka77]

beautiful landscape, the preservation of good for this age

[lazycat]

Igor Guriev

Yes, a million examples. You have the Crimean Schilder ever seen? He does another, having not much in common with the usual his work.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от lazycat

Igor Guriev

Yes, a million examples. You have the Crimean Schilder ever seen? He does another, having not much in common with the usual his work.

Couple of examples would not it?

He was, at the end of life has become such broad brush strokes to write?

[lazycat]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

a couple of examples would not it?

He was, at the end of life has become such broad brush strokes to write?

Crimean work - everything is written in broad strokes. Photos of work can not spread, they are no longer mine.

[sergejnowo]

Сообщение от lazycat

Not quite, I understood: only the edge of the duplicated or canvas entirely?

I also do not understand.
In the third photo, with the full increase is clearly seen that layer of paint "as new". Thus under Chipped paint discern little white and tselehenky canvas. Craquelure or any wear and tear does not smell. The question, why duplicate?
Oh sorry, but I have to any work in the first place went up like a remake, and only then by staging persuade himself that this is not so.
So, here I am myself in old age can not work to convince. Maybe the owner will help.
In my eyes, was taken the old job the end of 19 century, the layer of paint stripped and the old, refined canvas imposed latest work in style ....
With pleasure I will take back my words, if it is not.

[lazycat]

Сообщение от sergejnowo

did not also not clear.
In the third photo, with the full increase is clearly seen that layer of paint "as new". Thus under Chipped paint discern little white and tselehenky canvas. Craquelure or any wear and tear does not smell. The question, why duplicate?
Oh sorry, but I have to any work in the first place went up like a remake, and only then by staging persuade himself that this is not so.
So, here I am myself in old age can not work to convince. Maybe the owner will help.
In my eyes, was taken the old job the end of 19 century, the layer of paint stripped and the old, refined canvas imposed latest work in style ....
With pleasure I will take back my words, if it is not so.

Yes normal Schilder. The most wrong, that only can be - to assess the authenticity of the photos.