|
English | Русский | ![]() |
Регистрация | Дневники | Справка | Пользователи | Поиск | Сообщения за день | Все разделы прочитаны |
Investing in Art Share your opinion about the profitability of investments. |
![]() |
|
Опции темы | Опции просмотра |
![]() |
Язык оригинала: Русский #1 |
Местный
Регистрация: 12.04.2008
Сообщений: 191
Спасибо: 102
Поблагодарили 92 раз(а) в 46 сообщениях
Репутация: 87
|
![]()
I was so interested. Forum has existed for some time, written a lot of thinking about investing in art, about profitability. But, if in practice? Even let them virtually? Suppose you have a million dollars, where would you have to invest and for how long?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Язык оригинала: Русский #3 |
Гуру
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,444 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23525
|
![]()
Nothing in the two years is not changed, think nothing. With this budget line for investment only to the sixties. Per million with a certain luck will buy 5.8 first-class canvases representatives "other art" of the first magnitude with high investment potential. Sergeyitch, and what you have been offered? Why doubted?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Язык оригинала: Русский #4 |
Авторитет
Регистрация: 17.04.2008
Сообщений: 940
Спасибо: 66
Поблагодарили 1,047 раз(а) в 392 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 1
Репутация: 624
|
![]()
The sixties, which cost two /five years ago, 20 000-100 000 $ now in the hundreds, and under a million.
Hence the question: - Will also grow rapidly? Most likely on individual artists, rather than on the phenomenon in general. Maybe easier to buy a Picasso, graphics, or that there is enough. At least get to "falshak" complicated provenance, etc. - will be understandable. And since the sixties is the most painful issue. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Язык оригинала: Русский #5 |
Гуру
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,444 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23525
|
![]()
Sergeyitch, Picasso - a bad example, he basically can not grow as fast as the "venture" artists, favorites emerging market. Picasso is unlikely to buy for speculative purposes, at best maintain or slightly increase. And for the sake of prestige. Considerably faster than the market he is unlikely to grow. "Fire", ie a sharp rise in price considerably faster than the market can only things that contain risks and therefore undervalued. I'm not talking about the risks of origin (authenticity), but about the risks of recognition, market career. If you guess an artist, you can expect "a shot." Among the sixties still have such. Among modern art have names, but there are too high risks. Among the antique vystrelevshih artists can recall the German and Austrian ekspressonistov - some pictures can be seen at the Salon now in the arena.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Язык оригинала: Русский #6 |
Гуру
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,444 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23525
|
![]()
To the sixties grew at the same pace - it is extremely unlikely. And this is normal. At that rate, you can grow under two conditions: 1) underestimation of 2) growth with low initial base. Option to make the ruble ten rubles was always much easier than a hundred thousand to a million.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Язык оригинала: Русский #7 |
Гуру
Регистрация: 16.04.2008
Сообщений: 1,213
Спасибо: 1,422
Поблагодарили 7,269 раз(а) в 947 сообщениях
Репутация: 5499
|
![]()
Sergeyitch, I do not understand what kind of "sick" question you say, in my sixties with no issues at all there. And deal with them much easier than with most other areas, and from the investment point of view, they are still one of the most interesting segments of the market. And, interestingly, is a global trend: the Western "sixties" - today one of the fastest growing markets.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Язык оригинала: Русский #8 |
Гуру
|
![]()
I would invest in undervalued western artists, in some fauvists example. and agreed with previous speakers about the sixties, there are still a lot of names on which you can earn decent. Much more than a Picasso, in my opinion. more promising artists in the Russian art I do not see. I'm not talking about superpuperpervoklassnyh things avant-garde.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Язык оригинала: Русский #9 |
Гуру
Регистрация: 04.06.2008
Сообщений: 14,663
Спасибо: 18,865
Поблагодарили 16,456 раз(а) в 4,506 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 271
Репутация: 32443
|
![]()
Without hesitation, would invest in Gerasimov AM, Konchalovsky, GerasimovaS.V., Plastova, Yakovlev VN, Baksheeva, Kupriyanov, Daineka, Romadina, Juon .. well, a dozen more names, in large paintings to 1950g.Poka You can buy the work of these authors to be 10-30 times cheaper than they are actually ...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Язык оригинала: Русский #10 |
Гуру
Регистрация: 28.03.2008
Сообщений: 9,415
Спасибо: 1,532
Поблагодарили 29,854 раз(а) в 6,714 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 10
Репутация: 27272
|
![]()
=942840 & m []=939420 & m []=939440 & m []=939460 & m []=939480 & m []=939500 & m []=960740 & m [ ]=958360"] http://artinvestment.ru/auctions/866/records.html?&m []=942840 & m []=939420 & m []=939440 & m []=939460 & m []=939480 & m []=939500 & m []=960740 & m []=958360
This is a link to Plastova, 10 th and 11 th of this month, his paintings will be sold at auction. Let's look at the results. Eugene If you can will predict the sales price. It will be interesting to compare. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Метки |
million dollars |
Опции темы | |
Опции просмотра | |
|
|
|