The auction results "Magnum Ars" October 18 2011

[Пелагея Ларина]

The auction results Magnum Ars October 18 2011.
«Russian and Western European paintings, drawings XIX-XX centuries».
 Directory - http://www.magnumars.ru/parts.php?dir=3
The results.
Of the 80 lots sold Lot 33 - 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 16, 21, 22, 35, 40, 43, 49, 50, 51, 54, 57, 59, 61, 62 , 63, 65, 70, 71, 72, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80.

Especially actively traded
1.Ryabushkin AP 'Family idyll, "1881, b /graphite pencil, 14.4 x 16.4 (Lot 1), starting $ 900, leaving $ 2200, belongs to the rare examples of early work of thin-ka.
2.Levitan II "On the Volga," 1880, x-k /m, 14,2 x 25,5 (Lot-12) start 89 000 $, leaving $ 100 000;
3.Klimentov MI "Panoramic View of the Kremlin." 1930s, b /smesh.tehnika, 48 x 75.5 (lot-59)), start $ 4500, leaving $ 9000;
4.Nalbandyan DA "CAPRI" 1972 c /m, 22 x 27 (Lot 61), start 15 000 $, leaving $ 22 000;

Etchings II Shishkin bought from the market, all three lots (№ 2, 35.80), and its "covert." end of the XIX century - the lot number 33 to anyone "did not match" (photo 5).

No one is interested in top-lots
6.Savrasov AK "NIGHT AT THE VOLGA. FISHING Campfire. "End of 1880, c /m, 48,2 x 72 with an estimate 000-500 450 000 $
7.Makovsky KE "Portrait of a girl in a hat with an ostrich pen" 1879, c /m, 116 x 90 (oval in a rectangle) with the estimate 000-500 450 000 $
as well as
8.Lezhe F. "Clowns and Horses", 1950 b /gouache, 43 x 61, 350 estimate 000-400 000 $.

Went unheeded two works of Ilya Repin - "Portrait of Vladimir Stasov," 1916, b /ink, ink, pen, brush and pencil, 50,3 x 32,2 (item number 15) and "Ecce Homo" 1867, c /m, 31 x 19 (Lot 28), landscape Polenov VD "Pyrenees. The border of France "in 1911, x-k /m, 20,5 x 39 - item number 14, and just great, I really liked the landscape Korovin, K. "Summer Landscape", 1914, Oil on canvas. 53 x 80 - lot number 29. (Photo 9), etc.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Yes ...
What Makovsky and Savrasov were Un-bought - it is not clear to me even once .

This kind of stuff at Sotheby's , Christie's like going briskly .

Or are things only in London and New York are buying , and in Moscow there ?

==========

Threat in the world I am surprised a lot of things.
Among them are two : why so popular artists such uninteresting Nalbandian and J. Pollock ?

[Santa]

Сообщение от Igor Guryev ; 1812433"

Shl I am surprised the world many things.
Among them are two : why so popular artists such uninteresting Nalbandian and J. Pollock ?

Guriev , Igor, do not be surprised >
Who , as they say .
I, for example , D. Nalbandian very much.
I know someone who bought it >
Regarding J. Pollack, with you - agree.

[Барвиха]

An expected result!
With these works, even very good.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Barvikha

It is the expected result! With these works, even very good.

Which, in the sense that work?
What a bad Savrasov or Makovsky? (I personally Makovsky just can not stand, but for him it is a good thing, or do not you think?).

Added after 2 minutes
=================
=================

Сообщение от Santa; 1812483"

I, for example, D. Nalbandian really like.

Could you explain why?
He's a bad painter, he is even more difficult given just tsvetosochetaniya all disharmonious in his paintings, all colors are crawling on you and scream galdyat ...
In the tone is never ever got, the compositions are always approximate and even slovenly.

However, Pollock is no better.
Pollock - a collapse * of painting is its absence, it is a blank space instead of painting.
While too much.
Malevich did a quarter century before, not only worms, and a square.
The principle is the same.

But since NAUS - Provincial country and she wanted to have their modernist, and the desire to have them was as large as the ability to influence world public opinion, and made themselves sasshovtsy "geniuses" in the first podvernuvshegosya material - some Pollock, de Kooning, Rothko and others.

_________
* What is skazanul, eh?
Was not expecting much as Pollock - Collopy - collapse (if you read back a bit and distort).

[Santa]

Сообщение от Igor Guryev ; 1812543"

Could you explain why ?

Strange question , I swear >
How can I explain - why?
Like it.
An experienced artist Dmitry Nalbandian.
Of course , a court painter , but so what ?
This "court" does not detract from his talent.
What you wrote about it - do not agree completely .
My opinion is . And nothing will change . >
But to argue, let's not .
My choice - D. Nalbandian.
Your choice - the other, are eligible. >

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Santa; 1812583"

My vote - D. Nalbandian .

I apologize to moderators of friends , but I beg you not to clean the following, since this is a quote .
About DA Nalbandian I learned long ago , back in 1971 or 1972, from his school teacher of drawing SP Chelnokov .

He visited the Kolyma , and called him "NABLYADYAN".

And he was right.

Comrade . Moderators , please do not clean the neologism former kolymchanina .

Comrade . Santa, I do not know you, you SERIOZNO ?
And what about color ?
It's also a complete lack of talent in this business? and ?

[Santa]

Сообщение от Igor Guryev ; 1812543"

He was a bad painter , he is even more difficult given just tsvetosochetaniya all disharmonious in his paintings , all colors are crawling on you and scream galdyat ...
In the tone is never ever got , the compositions are always approximate and even slovenly .

Сообщение от Igor Guryev ; 1812643"

And what about color ?
It's also a complete lack of talent in this business?

Dmitry Nalbandian Abramovich ( 09.02.1906 , Tbilisi - 1993 ), painter , People 's Artist of USSR (1969 ), member of Academy of Arts (1953 ), Hero of Socialist Labor ( 1976), twice winner of the Stalin Prize (1946 , 1951).

Strange discrepancy between titles and opinion of Comrade . Igor Guriev. > >

[mihailovoh]

Guriev , Igor,

" What Makovsky and Savrasov were Un-bought - it is not clear to me even once .

This kind of stuff at Sotheby's , Christie's like going briskly .

Or are things only in London and New York are buying , and in Moscow there ? "

Nothing udivitelnogo.Pol years ago, they were sold here in Moscow (in the PM. Gelos on ) is much cheaper and not uschli.Veschi horoshie.no price is not for the present time?
In London and ... audience is different and more ohvat.tseny fixed at the global level (their growth. in the future. concern the auction otherwise many will not buy .) prestige - worship for our customers. remains in the ground there zhe.da and money to buy are there , etc. . and m ....

[sportsmen]

Сообщение от Guriev , Igor

Yeah ...
What Makovsky and Savrasov were Un-bought - it is not clear to me even once . This kind of stuff at Sotheby's , Christie's like going briskly . Or are things only in London and New York are buying , and in Moscow there ?

In Moscow they draw, but in London and New York sell

Сообщение от Guriev , Igor

Threat in the world I am surprised a lot of things.
Among them are two : why so popular artists such uninteresting Nalbandian and J. Pollock ?

So after Pollock - " the greatest artist of the twentieth century " ( from the words of Cyril Syzran )