Monet-spot, Man-men (s)

[Причал]

Сообщение от Sim

It seems that the "level of development" depends on the ability to navigate in fact, in her senses and contexts. And the "set of human knowledge" plays in this case a not insignificant role.

And let all the engineers will differ from Watteau and Boucher will not distinguish between machine parts. Many will survive this "reality" in the "context" of modern tehnologizirovannogo society, with its differentiation because of the huge volume of information field.
The "sense of" let us be to ride a cart and carts, but with thoughts about Hegel .*
_____________
In the carriage, a cart-li
I ride at night from Bryansk I
All about him, all of Hegel -
My thought of the nobility.

Have you ever fully confident in the amount of its humanitarian expertise?
About Schmalkaldic wars co-thread aware of Google without?
If the four - I do not.

[Сима]

Сообщение от Berth

Have you ever fully confident in the amount of its humanitarian expertise?

Dear wharf! What a fool she is fully satisfied (more on the text)? I'm not just "in volume", but in "completeness" add-on is always doubt. (But I'm not enticed you into arguments about the terms). And believe me, from his youth had been compared with anything else (ie, with whom). I've heard SS Averintsev (which at my age was not a trick), and even AF Losev in Latin. What should be clear that Despise not "worse than pride, but because they really understand where they are - height.

Сообщение от Berth

O Schmalkaldic wars

Unfortunately, we must admit that I flunked the exam on the second part of the Middle Ages as a time to the question of Luther. A knife had to hack his way deeper. There's something I remember, and were "Schmalkaldic items. A war with this name (singular), as follows from Google's , was, like, one.

Сообщение от Berth

And let us all engineers will be distinguished from Watteau and Boucher will not distinguish between machine parts.

I see no reason to oppose these skills. And who gives a huge number of visits to the Guggenheim exhibition, MOMe or the Louvre. Not humanities same. In any case, they are not alone.

[Причал]

Сообщение от Sim

I see no reason to oppose these skills. And who gives a huge numbers of visits to the Guggenheim exhibition, MOMe or the Louvre. Not humanists same. In any case, they are not alone.

Course. Not only one in the humanities. Although the Russian Museum and the Pushkin Museum - more than all they ...
Several of my female friends teaches cultural studies at technical universities. The subject of the students do not like. For lack of system (they are geeks, and all want the system). For uselessness. For strangeness set cram knowledge. For these stupid cards, guessing that the idea of which is brought from the Faculty of Arts and Cultural Studies, and there certainly needed.

[Allena]

Сообщение от Berth

The subject of the students do not like. During the chaotic (they are geeks, and all want the system). For the futility. For the strangeness set cram knowledge. For these stupid cards, guessing that the idea of which brought from the Faculty of Arts and Culture and there is certainly needed.

I think you need to still share the subject and methodology of its teaching. Stupid technique can make even basic discipline unbearably boring, and vice versa. Yes, and the identity of a teacher, you will agree, is playing an important role.
The simplest example - school. You may wish to teach literature or history, that the most abstruse geeks will learn with enthusiasm (remember now, my class: speech at the literature of his classmates, it is to move the physics <!--~ ~-->, now a doctor of some terrible engineering sciences) and so to teach physics, that it and Landau Kapitsa disappointed would.
Therefore, if the desired object becomes hated, do not object to blame ...