Down creative

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от fabosch

And judging by their intensity, it is currently his main "face"

He was on Tverskaya salon closed, there are the windows I saw SALE, but opened a new Sheremetyevo in the shopping center.

[fabosch]

Cyril, and that he himself is there for "machine"?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от fabosch

Kirill, and that there he himself stands for" machine "?

I did not know.
"But the penny from there he goes, his bread.
I think that happens there.
Especially now, salon-it is only now opened.

[Сергей Дородный]

Among the artists we also distinguish the "creatives" (with a hint of disdain).
And they - the artists, creative people - with the same disdain they say about "outdated art" (or, as they put it there? "- Apparently stronger and far more piercing ).

"Creative" suggests that art has changed, it now new
 problem - not to transfer feelings (as before), and thought.
That is why they are pushing so on "context".
OK.
Then what happens? And that's what.
  One of the best definitions of art that I have met:
  "Art - a way to transfer non-personal feelings".
Try this definition instead of "feelings" substitute "thoughts" -

"Art - a non-personal way of communicating ideas".
And this art? Heh-heh.
This is journalism, essays, heromantiya - but not art.

Why is the concept of "creative art" has become so widespread?
I see two reasons:
1. (And home) - the press is very difficult to write about emotions and "emotional"
     art - it is difficult to translate into words what words is not and does not need them.
    They are very easy to write about the creative sites - which, in fact,
    are the words embodied in the material.
   And because in today's media-space weight journalists far more than
   artists and art together, they (journalists) and set the tone.
2. An army of "creator" of the advertising agency also wants higher
     "Spiritual" status. Bursting of artists. And the wage increase, however.
    A fellow journalists (after all, is often taught in some faculties)
   he is ready to help.

   So I personally think that "creative art" - is empty. And best
    modern art is not creative, but real.
    Take even Hearst skull - yes there art buzzing pohlesche than in the "Black Square". What is creativity?

[Allena]

Obviously, the best of the "creative" (adjective ) the mouth Famusov Griboedov:

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Allena

a word in simplicity does not say everything with a grimace

The French love songs you sing

And the top lead notes,

To military people and cling.
 
Because patriot. (c)

[Allena]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy

Because patriot.
(C)

Hmm ...
Only now with the prefix "anti ..."
But everything else - just for Famusov.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Allena

Obviously, the best of the "creative" (adjective) said mouth Famusov Griboedov:
"Word in simplicity not say everything with a grimace ..." Well here is to add?

Rezyume: Foreign "creatives" - a Russian "creativity" with a grimace.
(In my opinion, a simple and brief explanation)

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от "Sergei burly

Get at least Hearst skull - yes there is the art of buzzing pohlesche than in the" Black Square ". What is creativity?

Clarification:
It's definitely not creative is a creative borrowing, which in effect is a kind of "thieves 'creative'