Продам: Selling now Oleg Tselkov

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от FAIv

All right. Modesty, a direct path to obscurity!

When you contact a doctor that you are primarily interested in his modesty or professionalism?

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от FAIv

As assessments "strong - weak" I am sure there is a half-dozen collectors who compete with you , since scored late Tsalkova .

Yes, a hundred! What is changing?

It is interesting, but what is your opinion?

Added after 5 minutes

Сообщение от FAIv

Yes, and Oleg his early work is not a fan of

Naturally! He should be on sale after all what he is doing now!

Added after 7 minutes

Сообщение от FAIv

Still, for me remains a mystery: How to inferior picture, you can judge - a successful picture or not, "flat", etc. Not having this, as in your case, sure that before you falshak.
It is known that in the pictures so much depends on the angle, lighting, color .....

Sometimes it is possible, and sometimes not. In this case, the pictures enough.

[ФАИв]

Added after 3 minutes
Iren1974, Woe is me , so the life of me, on the photo with the size a postage stamp - can not understand anything. Alas, not for the average brain obviously "So you won

Added after 8 minutes
Tjutchev, I like the early Tselkov

Sometimes it is possible, and sometimes not. In this case, the pictures enough. - Mysterious approval

[ранжер]

Someone remarked that the narcissistic self-assurance and bragging is inversely proportional to intelligence and knowledge.

What hlestakovsky pressure in semi-literate "seer" poet! He made, and almost apologizing while not rating, but still a collector (!), In passing, let the condescending remark to the elderly, distinguished artist and not at all against the background of persistent narcissism and samovoshischeniya. Come "maestro" all have long understood that your adoration and love for himself more than mutual.

Throughout the theme is nothing but unsubstantiated allegations, any argument on the merits.

At Tsalkova not like. Moreover, 1960 - x. This - falshak.

This durilka was made with this work Tsalkova "Portrait of a flower." (1962, oil on canvas, plywood 75h60) from the collection of Boris Zaborova

Leaving aside the lyrics, then you think that this picture has a chance? You want to give advice to the buyer to go to Lina, turn to Oleg, but in any case not to trust the opinion of "seer"?

Everyone knows that Tselkov 60-ies. stronger, and late (90-ies.-2000-ies.) - is weaker. Therefore, the first impression that made on me a picture, and found its expression in words, that is - not Tselkov 60's. As a minimum. Analyzing further, I came to the conclusion that it is not Tselkov altogether. Ie my words reflect the course of my thoughts. And they have a certain logic.

If I say that the thing is not true, then the fact there are serious grounds, and I am absolutely sure.

What can I do if I see?

Meanwhile, the case is not so obvious, such as forgery or Burliuk Rabin in the relevant subject. And human collector FAIv that the handwriting of the signature on the back similar to the handwriting O. Tsalkova.
Similarities owned Zaborova now easily explained by one of the options. That is why whoever did this picture, did not write it, one by one overhead projector, and comply with the size smaller.
The inaccuracy of color attributed to the imperfection of photos, as also rightly noted FAIv.
But still, the pictures carry several formal features, which allow us to definitively state that it is a fake.

But the thing is that the "professional" Tjutchev not say no! In his "analysis" we have not seen any « of the » or «thought».

 Possible, all speculators know that Tselkov 60-ies. stronger, and late (90-ies.-2000-ies.) - weaker, and in art criticism assumed that Oleg Tselkov formed in professional a great artist in immigration and the best, large part of his work falls on 80-90-s of the 20 th century.
Previous years have been years of becoming a master, but there happened a very bright successes such as "The Last Supper", or still life, in 1964, they can also be attributed and "Portrait of a flower," but such luck was not much, much more through - Works like the one shown in this post.
I can attest to the artist's words about three of his paintings of that period with the exhibition "Time of Change": "Three piece of shit!" - And repeated with three exclamation marks, Three piece of shit! "

A relatively young man, that, except foolish self-confidence allows you to do in regard to older, distinguished, famous Russian artist such statements « Of course! He should be on sale after all what he is doing now! »?

My answer to you is responsible and other speculators - Oleg Nikolayevich Tsalkova long do do not need sell! He and his family all have five lives, and given that lived 30 years in a consumer society, he never became a vulgar consumer, then MB, and ten. Give the words of the French collector in front of the picture O. Tsalkova on one show. "I left my business and no longer buy paintings for my collection, and this painting from the collection of the artist is not for sale. However, if one day I learned that she was selling, I sbudu his apartment in the 16th district of Paris, has been laid, it will be necessary if the house of her parents, the loan amount for missing friends, but Purchase this masterpiece! .

Once again for all and speculators alone - an outstanding Russian artist, last quarter of the 20 th century Oleg Tselkov become one of immigration, namely in France.

Tiutchev will need to move from the "maestro" in "candidate master". However, no candidate for the master is something of sports, and we're on a high, not counting the money. We still call him a journeyman. Still, he loads on this forum a lot though not his, but sometimes it is interesting material.

[Vladimir]

I personally potreyal groundwork for emotional events. What conclusions? I now see the Leonid Bazhanov, passing by the imposing size and matching on a plot canvas Tsalkova (while under consideration in the first post work is a modest size 55 for height). Forge Tsalkova initially quite pointless, because there are lots of options for reliably authenticate (they have listed on the forum). On the other hand, there are credible alternatives to authenticate Roginskii and Stozharov that does not prevent them forge. The case is not simple, certainly not obvious - in vain you're so vehemently opponiruete Tiutchev.

ranzher - and you in America?

[fross]

Сообщение от Vladimir

I personally potreyal groundwork for emotional events. What conclusions? I now see the Leonid Bazhanov, passing by the imposing size and matching on a plot canvas Tsalkova (while under consideration in the first post work is a modest size 55 for height). Forge Tsalkova initially quite pointless, because there are lots of options for reliably authenticate (they have listed on the forum). On the other hand, there are credible alternatives to authenticate Roginskii and Stozharov that does not prevent them forge. The case is not simple, certainly not obvious - in vain you're so vehemently opponiruete Tiutchev.

ranzher - and you in America?

I thought this one is not clever. Here are wondering whether all the same fake, or whether one of those three, that the author himself aptly described in his early works .
In the photo I understood from the collection Zaborova, the dream of French collector? No, I certainly heard that this is a passion, covers, but the parents on the street ...

[ФАИв]

ranzher, He and his family all have five lives
 Had the opportunity to make sure your words, because he was graciously received Oleg in September 2004. Very nice family. Absolutely quiet part to sell anything.
An interesting detail, I'm embarrassed dragged melezimny most expensive cognac, which was contemptuously rejected in favor of wine from the liter package

Here's an artist at his home and his dear wife

[Konstantin]

FAIv but really, if there is contact with rubles, it can ask to see the Internet because he is.

[ФАИв]

Konstantin, I think this is the case of the buyer or seller honest

[ранжер]

Сообщение от Konstantin

but really, if there is contact with rubles, it can ask to see the Internet because he is.

Why? You doubt that it is a fake?

[Konstantin]

Yes, sure. In my opinion similar to the present, but in this case is not ready to take a final opinion, because what I saw live was better. And much about the pictures of the house itself Oleg Nikolayevich (with photos FAIv) say nothing - masterpieces. The Internet is one of dignity and it is the same drawback - it is publicity. If you leave the conversation on this, then the seller will most likely problem with this picture, because a plume of doubt. Yes and no right to leave the question hanging in the possibility to find out. We have the opportunity to communicate with rubles, but not directly, and it will take time.