At night all cats are gray. Or not all? - Page 3 - Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

SergeiSK · 11-08-2009, 23:56

17. - Egon Schiele?

Tana · 12-08-2009, 00:40

Somehow, it seems that 9 or 10, Munch, Kokoschka 2 and Monet 20: o
Toulouse-Lautrec, 4 and may be 2?

LCR · 12-08-2009, 13:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tana

Somehow it seems that 9 or 10, Munch, Kokoschka 2 and Monet 20: o
Toulouse-Lautrec, 4 and may be 2?

For example, Toulouse-Lautrec counted it number 4.
Well done, Tana

eva777 · 12-08-2009, 22:14

18 - Kandinsky?
12 - Mac?
2 Munch?
Monet's 11 or 12?
16 - Schiele?
1 - Kirchner?
Shocking simply that invented LSR

)
attempt, as torture

)

Jasmin · 12-08-2009, 22:22

No. 19 - Vlaminck?

fross · 12-08-2009, 22:27

Monet exactly 11,
Schiele 18
2, if not Munch, then Vlaminck

?
This is what happens Mondrian is not an abstract? That is really terrible. Maybe 17?

Jasmin · 12-08-2009, 22:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by fross

2, if not Munch, then Vlaminck?

In Vlaminck broad smear should be ...

eva777 · 12-08-2009, 22:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jasmin

Y Vlaminck broad smear should be ...

Oh, I do not see the brush strokes and even

) just try to guess the color

Jasmin · 12-08-2009, 22:42

No. 16 - Kandinsky?
No. 18 - Kirchner, in my opinion?

fross · 12-08-2009, 22:44

But if 15 was almost Kandinsky, then 16 should be exactly it

A Kirchner, if not 1, then 19?
That's in anticipation of LCR we now quickly will go to all the possible options and it would be nothing left to admit we were right .

12-08-2009, 22:14	Original language: Russian #24
eva777 Авторитет Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Москва Posts: 806 Thanks: 1,778 Thanked 885 Times in 243 Posts Reputation: 1165	18 - Kandinsky? 12 - Mac? 2 Munch? Monet's 11 or 12? 16 - Schiele? 1 - Kirchner? Shocking simply that invented LSR) attempt, as torture) __________________ «Художник – это человек, который пишет то, что можно продать. А хороший художник – это человек, который продаёт то, что пишет». ПАБЛО ПИКАССО

12-08-2009, 22:27	Original language: Russian #26
fross Гуру Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 3,418 Thanks: 2,915 Thanked 5,168 Times in 1,142 Posts Reputation: 13013	Monet exactly 11, Schiele 18 2, if not Munch, then Vlaminck? This is what happens Mondrian is not an abstract? That is really terrible. Maybe 17?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

11-08-2009, 23:56	Original language: Russian #21
SergeiSK Гуру Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Russia, $ochi Posts: 5,666 Thanks: 1,397 Thanked 6,209 Times in 1,926 Posts Blog Entries: 4294967279 Reputation: 9995	17. - Egon Schiele?

12-08-2009, 00:40	Original language: Russian #22
Tana Гуру Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 2,430 Thanks: 16,535 Thanked 3,169 Times in 901 Posts Reputation: 5353	Somehow, it seems that 9 or 10, Munch, Kokoschka 2 and Monet 20: o Toulouse-Lautrec, 4 and may be 2?

12-08-2009, 22:22	Original language: Russian #25
Jasmin Гуру Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: ישראל Posts: 2,566 Thanks: 6,355 Thanked 2,524 Times in 963 Posts Reputation: 4255	No. 19 - Vlaminck?

12-08-2009, 22:42	Original language: Russian #29
Jasmin Гуру Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: ישראל Posts: 2,566 Thanks: 6,355 Thanked 2,524 Times in 963 Posts Reputation: 4255	No. 16 - Kandinsky? No. 18 - Kirchner, in my opinion?

12-08-2009, 22:44	Original language: Russian #30
fross Гуру Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 3,418 Thanks: 2,915 Thanked 5,168 Times in 1,142 Posts Reputation: 13013	But if 15 was almost Kandinsky, then 16 should be exactly it A Kirchner, if not 1, then 19? That's in anticipation of LCR we now quickly will go to all the possible options and it would be nothing left to admit we were right .