Fake oil Anatoly Zverev. How to distinguish? One of the techniques

[Vladimir]

Continuing theme raised by Eugene about whether you want to know the public methods accomplice to independently filter explicit falshaki or better not to shine the information that the quality of counterfeits is not growing. At one time, an experienced collector showed how to distinguish a gross falsification of paintings by Zvereva (on formal grounds). There is only one feature: in his works Zverev intentionally left unpainted areas of the surface, using surface color of the canvas or board as another organic color compositions. For example, the original brown surface of the cardboard he used as a brown color - as if this is one of the planned colors. Accordingly, much of the surface on the original works Zvereva remains unpainted. This kind of thing many accomplice did not know or did not pay attention, so their "pseudo-Zverev," these "flaws" removed - the whole surface carefully so carefully painted over, without permits. Please note that many of the oil bought on the internet or in the treatment of a suspect made it so neatly. And another very rough forgeries in the eye can throw accurately derived signature Alkmaar - also a sure sign. In the original works made sweeping AZ albeit not without egotism, of course, without such pretentiousness.

It is clear that all this applies to things crude, but at least something.

I agree dedulya37, that such information must be disclosed and published. So if anyone has experienced with the methods poddelschikov - share, a useful thing, let's gather the knowledge base.

------
Poll: "Should I disclose the details of examination?"