Help identify the author.

[Santa]

Сообщение от usynin2

Spelling leave:

Сообщение от usynin2

Aunt May was friends with the sisters Obolensky, whose roots extend from the kind of Tolstoy.

Aunt and niece are out of luck > (taking into account spelling niece) >

Sorry for the slight digression from the main theme.
>

[U_Z]

Сообщение от usynin2

As you can easily check and make disciples.

Make the chemistry of paint.

Added after 4 minutes

Сообщение от usynin2

I also think that the last letter of Church Slavonic J.

Not like "I".

[usynin2]

Сообщение от U_Z; 1795863"

make the chemistry of paint .

Unfortunately we do in Maikop, it is not possible : If it were possible to analyze the paint, most of the questions would at once fell off ! Alas , alas .

Сообщение от Santa; 1795853"

Aunt and niece out of luck (I take into account spelling niece )

 I agree with you ! Although it may just called Aunt May ? >

[color="#666 686"]Posted by 22 minutes[/color]
Here are found on Wikipedia about Prince Obolensky :
Alexander D. Obolensky (1847 - 1917). Alexander D. Obolensky, inherits from his aunt Anna Petrovna Bakhmetyeva ( nee Countess Tolstoy , did not have children, the family estate in 2000 acres with a large crystal factory.
So what I have written about the relationship of Obolensky and Tolstoy , pravda.Zdes on the forum a great connoisseur of the noble families links Wladzislaw. Maybe he will clarify this issue .

[U_Z]

Сообщение от usynin2

Thin canvas

Canvas duplicated on board (most likely for safety) and cut around the perimeter - pay attention to the right corner of the painting (canvas hall) and the "dot" in the upper right corner (something got under canvas in duplicate).

[U_Z]

Сообщение от usynin2

Help to read the signature

Read as "Chelnyanka" - a resident of Naberezhnye Chelny.


PS: Unfortunately, there is no sense that the signature was made in 1902, although it can be easily checked.

[tivat]

Сообщение от U_Z

: Read " Chelnyanka " - a resident of Naberezhnye Chelny.

PS: Unfortunately, there is no sense that the signature was made in 1902, although it can be easily verified .

Letters, somewhere , as Church Slavonic. On the front side of the canvas even "fly kaknula not ." (sorry, no traces of insect life .) No nail polish . Or down? Signed, perhaps something like " Gypsy "? However, a gypsy is not very similar.

[I-V]

Сообщение от tivat; 1795733"

Letters, somewhere , as Church Slavonic

Сообщение от usynin2; 1795813"

I also think that the last letter of Church Slavonic I

I hope no one seriously suggests that it Yus small ( great )? >

Yes, just shook the hand of the artist - that's A and "sagging" - not that it's just brushes the letters show . >

I do not see any stylistic contradictions from 1902. In addition, this style is typical of the date of the 20th century.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от IV

I hope no one seriously suggests that this small Yus?
>

Yes, the artist must be a great original, to sign such a playful portrait of the Old Church Slavonic letters.
>

Added after 1 minutes
IV, then divorced pranksters ...
Do not pay attention, they seem to themselves do not fully understand what they write.
>

[Игорь Гурьев]

Painting I do think the middle of the 20th century.

[I-V]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

then divorced pranksters ...

Poor Princess Obolensky, it is a gypsy, then chelnyanka ..
Lost all that she - gentlewoman!.
What kind of joke?!
It is time to stand up the insulted honor of the ladies >