"Black Square" by Malevich: who feels that, looking at this picture

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Vlasta

And I" bugs, glitches ... " I have good eyesight!
__________________

Vlasta, "glitches" in this context sluduet read as "optical illusion" .. (Including horoshngo!)
(And that, interestingly, the admins thought that my post about "krakelyurnye bugs" removed?)
And all we had in mind. it consists krakelyurchik (raskladyvetsya) in the picture (the cat there, the elephant ...)

[Pavel]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

Vlasta, "glitches" in this context sluduet read as "optical illusion" .. (Including horoshngo!)
(And that, interestingly, the admins thought that my post about "krakelyurnye bugs" removed?)
And all we had in mind. it consists krakelyurchik (raskladyvetsya) in the picture (the cat there, the elephant ...)

Nat you're just good!

[Vlasta]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA; 1479501"

Vlasta, "glitches" in this context sluduet read as "optical illusion" .. (Including horoshngo!)
(And that, interestingly, the admins thought that my post about "krakelyurnye bugs" removed?)
And all we had in mind. it consists krakelyurchik (raskladyvetsya) in the picture (the cat there, the elephant ...)

Yeah, removed ... Oddly, perhaps, by mistake? I read about krakelyurny water-based varnish, which "is used to create the effect of cracking the top layer of paint, the so-called effect Crazing" . By the way, there is such a visual effect. Yes, and we joke about the glitches, it's understandable.

[Seriy]

I will not argue with the speakers before, but my opinion is not written essay, it is a different color of paint in the upper layer - there is green, and blue is. Or a crude sketch and paint mixed up or Malevich did it on purpose, that is multicolored square. In the end, no it does not interfere with walk again black immediately or later, if the idea was a dull-black.
 Variegation he pursued in depth.
Yes, written sometimes comes through the years, but through the whitewash, not through the soot. Soot, by contrast, can migrate into the upper layers and make the surface even more dark.

[Ylot]

Сообщение от Seriy

I will not argue with the speakers before, but my opinion is not written essay, it is a different color of paint in the upper layer - there is green, and blue is. Or a crude sketch and paint mixed up or Malevich did it on purpose, that is multicolored square. In the end, no it does not interfere with walk again black immediately or later, if the idea was a dull-black.
 Variegation he pursued in depth.
Yes, written sometimes comes through the years, but through the whitewash, not through the soot. Soot, by contrast, can migrate into the upper layers and make the surface even more dark.

That's the artist himself up ...

Dispute may not be necessary, but understand - not!
Malevich did not create a "depth", but rather pictorial means, reduced to a flat perception of "KGB", removing the illusion of spatial depth (forward, backward, and aerial perspective) .

This creatively complex and interesting.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Ylot

Here is an artist himself up ...

Dispute may not be necessary, but understand - not!
Malevich did not create a "depth", but rather pictorial means, reduced to a flat perception of "KGB", removing the illusion of spatial depth (forward, backward, and aerial perspective) .

This is creatively more complicated and interesting.

I sovetayu you before talking about the artist, see his work. Then do not have to invent it. Malevich did not write the glaze and expressiveness reached precisely the contrast. Look read, then you say. Lessirovkm is an academy, and he was named an enemy. In general, the complexity is not ispolenii, and in the perception of painting. Difficult to do simply a school, but simply and so that a lively and expressive so that, that's hard to do.

[Seriy]

Ylot, instead teoritezirovaniya, go to the Tretyakov Gallery and take a look original.

That's what I-doing the original and always look on me no explanation is needed.

[Posav]

Or Malevich wanted to show the hard-imperessionisticheski a rich black color, or it was a gesture that I take your These colors do nafikk, black ones.
But the second option, he would be declared verbally.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Posav

or Malevich wanted to show the hard-imperessionisticheski a rich black color, or it was a gesture that I take your These colors do nafikk, black ones. But the second option, he would be declared verbally.

There's the usual black paint, kst burnt. Why invent? Just to sketch and paint sagged with age, dark.

[Ylot]

Сообщение от Seriy

Ylot, instead teoritezirovaniya, go to the Tretyakov Gallery and take a look original.
That's what I-doing the original and always look on me no explanation is required.

Sergei! You do not even "dress"! If you are applying to the "artist" should be understood, must! Otherwise - the amateur.

Museums You do not scare , I live in them [IMG] http://www.beatrisa.ru/style_emoticons/default /84c93.gif [/IMG]

Added after 6 minutes

Сообщение от Pavel

In the conventional black paint, kst burnt.
Why invent?
Just to sketch and paint sagged with age, darkening.

Not so much left to the workers' Pasta Factory ", as you probably are applying for a" last "producer and lover of" noodles "?

Added after 9 minutes 17 minutes

Сообщение от Pavel

I sovetayu you before talking about the artist, see his work ...

Dear Pavel, as opposed to ... "some" before "to call" human artist, of course, I primarily looked at the work

Here is an artist himself up ...

, but you are advised to read and reread my article, End misadventures of the Black Square », p. 1923 Forum. And so until not understand "CHK".