Digital painting, prospects

[Posav]

That thought, that there are issues about the uniqueness of the product, ie not visible hand touch, it is not clear what to do with the notion of "original" if all these pixels are copied. Smears not skopiruesh. There is also the problem of authorship. Since this pixel, then how to prove that they're yours? Since there is no unique identity, then this work can be done by anyone and anyone named by the author. I recently read that Dubosarsky Vinogradov and the kitchen boy sitting at the computer and makes erections Tipo tolerate other heads on the classic work, then they will increase, podmazhut and will be their job, but they at least increase the matter themselves and podmazhut.

[Marta]

I think that theoretically could now be what you want art, including digital. If you print on canvas, but to disperse the meter for two or three, still think of something, like bring: perhaps some glaze or varnish, then why not. Besides the millions it will not do - the world go Another thing - the issue of sales and the issue price. And where they do not, these issues? And still - digital art "under the oil" makes no sense to do. More logical to write butter and print posters. Still, if you do digital art, then it must be something - well, a digital <!--~ a ~-->. Anything else does not like.

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Сообщение от Posav

Here is thought that there are issues about the uniqueness of the product, ie not visible hand touch, it is not clear what to do with the notion of "original" if all these pixels are copied. Smears not skopiruesh.

But it really is!
You look at a picture in picture abstraktsionistkom style, and do not understand what all the so admired? For example, Rothko and Pollock (specify that the first I do not like totally).

A look at the reality - the colors a little, not a riot of colors, composition no, no story too! But you can scrutinize the texture of the canvas, skillfully made by the artist!
Try to convey the texture pixel ....

[Roman Guro]

Posav,

There is also a problem with the author. Since this pixel, then how to prove that they're yours? Since there is no unique identity, then this work can be done by anyone and anyone named by the author.

Individual letters IS. After all, his hands drawn
Just as in real.
Here, for example fragments closer:

Вложение 778931Вложение 778941
There is a smear, stroke, etc.
Textures do not smear, it is less sure.

As for proof of authorship, you are right. If legally, then the best proof of authorship is the possession of the file is original. The proof is on the level of peer review is also possible, but difficult

[Marta]

Someday, when digital art to implement and will settle thoroughly, something will come up with proof of authorship. Some sort of registration of copyright. But then again - under the oil, linocut, etching and other work does not make sense. Looking for something unusual.

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Сообщение от Marta

Someday, when digital art to implement and will settle thoroughly, something will come up with proof of authorship. Some sort of registration of copyright.

Copyright - no problem.
The problem is interesting for investment - the ability to bulk copy the product digital design. Look at old photos or posters were at one time lottery products. And often worthless, especially propaganda posters. Nobody is stored, not the bank. Gradually, from one million up to now have lived only thousands and hundreds of copies, coordinates bear the imprint of time. Original lost. Layout lost. File the original did not exist.

And now a digital file is.

[Posav]

Сообщение от Marta

Someday, when digital art to implement and will settle thoroughly, something will come up with proof of authorship. Some sort of registration of copyright. But then again - under the oil, linocut, etching and other work does not make sense. Looking for something special.

If smears "under canvas, under the painting" can not logically, like a surrogate. However, if drawn on an electronic board, a special "pen", then at least an individual, the author's handwriting, hand movement, the way - there.

[sur]

While you are talking here, gentlemen, I have picked up and copied his first picture (which I liked). And what shall I interfere to take and print it on an inkjet printer, framed and hung on the wall ?
 I will not, of course, to do this, if only because I lack a good zhivopisi.No the principle ...
  Roman Guro, as well as you think about electronic music? I like to nepolnotsennoy.Hotya it also writes like a man, not the computer.
 I do not know if you know how to paint with oil, then why do not you such refinements?
  For me, photography will always remain a photograph, a picture painted with oil-painting .

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Roman Guro

here a matter of commercial expediency in our realities.

For me now the most urgent question of physical space, so I shoved the circumstances of the figure, the PC, .. I live poorer than Van Gogh, his bedroom was separate-but my studio - in the bedroom-(tired)
thinking at emalnye miniature switch-husband is not allowed to include oven,
So officially declare: Please accept the Association.
And bvrabanu. they say .. Let them say ...

Added after 20 minutes

Сообщение от Roman Guro

And I send a file,

And what you asta?

Added after 25 minutes

Сообщение от Marta

Still, if you do digital art, then it must be something - well, very digital. Anything else does not like.

Marta, the work itself will teach!

[Roman Guro]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

So officially declare: Please accept the Association.
And on the drum. they say .. Let them say ...

Help me, than I can)
Digital painting is good for experimentation, rapid sketches.
Even with oil painting, it is useful search colors with it, do podmalevki and jot down the track, so you do not seek on the canvas, and know exactly what you're doing.

Besides, in my opinion, it is good for learning.
The laws of painting work the same.
However, in real painting does not avoid the "fight" with the material.
The young artist can not begin to write a lively yet learned how to mix colors, do not get rid of dirt on the canvas and palette.

And what you asta?

Not fully understood the question.
Remaining money that the customer has paid under the contract
If it is important to keep proof of authorship to the file, you can do something like this:
The original file remains in the author.
Customer transmitted file is truncated to 10-20 pixels on each side.
To view this is not essential, but is sufficient proof of authorship in the case, such as unauthorized use.

In general, use an image (print, multiply, sell) without the consent of the author is not so easy, you must have the rights to such use in the form of copyright agreement. Otherwise, great opportunity to run into. Blame is not difficult to prove

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

The most attractive for me it is that thumbnails do not deteriorate, not get lost and do not take place and not have to make efforts to preserve them.

You beat my answer