Exhibition Giorgio De Chirico in Paris

[fross]

Сообщение от LCR

What to watch, all have long seen

Surrealists for soap !!!

And if this period Chirico will be the best?

[LCR]

Сообщение от fross

And if this period Chirico will be the best ?

So what is change?
I, in fact, proceed from the hypothesis that this period Chirico - the best.
Hence, the best period Chirico incomparably better than all that baked these psychos - and this is an axiom in the proofs, it does not need)))

[IrinaC]

Сообщение от LCR

Well, and that this will change?
I, in fact, proceed from the hypothesis that this period Chirico - the best.
Hence, the best period Chirico incomparably better than all that baked these psychos - and this is an axiom in the proofs, it does not need )))

LCR, why you have such an attitude to them, tell me, svp

[fross]

Сообщение от LCR

Well, and that this will change?
I, in fact, proceed from the hypothesis that this period Chirico - the best.
Hence, the best period Chirico incomparably better than all that baked these psychos - and this is an axiom in the proofs, it does not need )))

And the conclusion of these hypotheses with the axioms you have done paradoxical:

Сообщение от LCR

Surrealists for soap!

[LCR]

Сообщение от IrinaC

LCR, why you have such an attitude to them, tell me, svp

Because I, Ira, I love painting, but they have - except Magritte, who all managed to create some onirichesky world - painting and does not smell, one vymorochenny, strained anecdote. Four-flusher and hacks.

No wonder over them made fun of all and sundry
However, in commercial terms with nimh can only take an example - this is an area they had a real talent.

Dali, for example, in 1920-ies. went to Freud - to show their products and the endorsement of psychoanalytic cases Wizard - for businesses that would be very bad, just could be 30-40 per cent price increase. But the Fakir was drunk, and the focus and podsoznankoy failed: Freud dryly explained the mustachioed smart aleck that he is looking for a subconscious (and sometimes is) a normal painting, but salvadorovskie invention he was not interested.

[qwerty]

Сообщение от LCR

Because I, Ira, I love painting, but they have - except Magritte, who all managed to create some onirichesky world - painting and does not smell, one vymorochenny, strained anecdote. Four-flusher and hacks.

Dear Nana, You are still very subjective. Delvaux, Picabia, Dominguez, Tanguy, Matta just do not deserve such words. And the best work so unloved you like Dali's "Discovery of America by Columbus" or "Hunting for tuna, I think differently as masterpieces can not be named.

[LCR]

Сообщение от qwerty

Dear Nana, You are still very subjective. Delvaux, Picabia, Dominguez, Tanguy, Matta just do not deserve such words. And the best work so unloved you like Dali's "Discovery of America by Columbus" or "Hunting for tuna, I think differently as masterpieces can not be named.

My dear ytsuken

No claims to objectivity, I do not, I offer only an opinion.

[Meister]

Сообщение от LCR

There were no claims to objectivity, I do not, I offer only an opinion.

Liana, it is you have too categorical. I understand someone and not like the Impressionists, but this is not a reason to call them four-flusher, and a hack. Everybody has their own taste, which some may like the fact that there is not any, but positiveness to pour one of the most famous and recognized trends in the world of art, in my opinion, as a minimum, unethical. Let me remind you that over a van Gogh and over Makkah and Pechstein also laughed a lot ... But they were brilliant artists ... Contemplate the work that I prigalayu below, can you change your opinion ...

[Glasha]

In spite of its omnivorous and tolerance, too, can not stand surrealism.
But I will say more, Chirico also not "touches" (why - only God knows) - curiously, not more ...

[Ninni]

Surrealism I like the idea (the combination of dream and reality) but in my opinion it is perfectly embodied the concept of Bosch, Goya is very illustrative - a series of etchings "Caprichos" ....
  For this style hides many of lack of talent and people are absolutely not smyslyaschie in the art. This was a very, very helped Dali, Magritte, Ernst, etc ... I do not like this surrealism in their understanding and their tray. I can not look at the hideously mangled form - though rotten body, do not attract as very poor tsvetosochetaniya (about painting course, as we are not talking), contrived and competition in the "fantasy" a slap in the eyes of its vulgarity ...

Surrealism is a kind of temptation, and many "hidden" in it like an ostrich in the sand, completely forgetting that they are all the same visible.
In art, only art must be immense - the rest is measured by highly sensitive weights especially in surrealism.

Those artists who will be able to look at surrealism in unusual, not the sensational world - have the chance to create a worth something.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 1 minute[/color]

Сообщение от Gala

But I will say more, Chirico also not "touches" - curiously, not more ...

I am so the same