"Lyalya naked Viktor Reikhet. Who knows where she is?

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от LCR

To me, it can, without problems. Look, look at this Gapchinskuyu or Galchinsky - that is not "quite tasteless thing"?

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

No, this example is not suitable.

I will not apologize for the naive question - why "picture" Gapchinskoy not suitable as an example of "quite tasteless things"?
Maybe Mr. Art - dealer Cyril Syzransky formulate a response without verses and sayings.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

why "picture" Gapchinskoy not suitable as an example of "quite tasteless things"?

You do not carefully read my text.
Actually, the conversation goes on sale dealers "completely tasteless things"?
In my opinion, it is the dealers do not sell things Gapchinskoy.
She is now doing very well. Well, about "successful" is not for me to judge, actually, but what a lively discussion of its themes potent gapchinskimi "I realized that this view of its promotion they have created.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Well, about "successful" is not for me to judge, actually, but what a lively discussion of its themes potent gapchinskimi "I realized that this view of its promotion they have created.

For me personally, there is no such confidence .. I do not think that is really successful in need of various bluff (IMHO) ..

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

you do not carefully read my text.

Yes, all I have carefully read.
Do you have an artist "Marshal tacky" because its dealers did not sell and have to sell yourself.
The other does not fit into the creator of "quite tasteless things" as is its dealers "things" do not sell, and successfully sells itself.
If you have such a muddle with the criteria approach, what to speak of ordinary mortals.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

Do you have an artist "Marshal tacky" because its dealers did not sell and have to sell yourself.

Two. I have two named. And they are "tacky marshals" not because of their "dealers do not sell it." Their dealers do not sell just, in my opinion, that sell their art outside the context of media aura, which they created impossible.

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

But the other does not fit into the creator of "quite tasteless things" because Dealers just her "thing" does not sell, and successfully sells itself.

No, the "other" like a Creator "quite tasteless things," appropriate, VYACHESLAV.
I am myself a "creator" something and not interested in a poche his "creations".
I am interested only in relations "creator" with dealers. And they, I think, is just not.
Chewed? All clear now?
Or you, too, on items spread out?
With quotes and without "poems and jokes?

Добавлено через 1 час 36 минут

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

For example, Vlaminck 1920-1930-x

A, Vlaminck ...
OK.
Think that it "broke" under the gallery owners demand?
In the "fun" 20's was the demand for these landscapes, where he began with color, contrasts with the experiment?
I do not know ... I do not know ...
Everything is possible.
But you will agree, the artist is changing, his life, he is getting older, finally. Vlaminck in 30-m was already over 50 long and 40-m all for 60, it is difficult to expect from him "fovistkoy" Expression first years of the century.
Although I have the history of "breaking" Vlaminck do not know, you know better there in PA


1. Vlaminck 1910.
2. Vlaminck 1925.