Dying frescoes by Andrei Rublev!

[Самвел]

Nonsense, in the sense that it did not fix, let posochuvstvuem, but so what? where sympathy helped the cause? It only exacerbates an already bad job, gathering around sympathetic onlookers. If this example with your friend, indirectly related to my posts in this thread, then I do not think you are doing is even a good thing.

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Samvel

I do not think so

I understood you correctly so, do not worry.

[Причал]

Сообщение от dedulya37

I have understood you correctly so, do not worry.

In your case just understand everything - and the initiator and executor, and the controller, and the owner - all rolled into one

and there ...

there is now the rightful owner is, and I think that cost-conscious use of the property - is not only his right but a duty. So let him engaged.

[artcol]

Сообщение от dedulya37

- And I want a memorial museum to arrange his father's workshop.
- And the horseradish ???

dedulya37, God help you!

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от Maroussia

In an open letter to President Medvedev in Moscow museum staff said that the frescoes of Andrei Rublev in the cathedrals of Zvenigorod and Vladimir lost. Also, they say, is on the brink of death and the iconostasis Rublev in the Trinity-Sergius Lavra.

If the president wants to help, he naytet couple of oligarchs, so they are benefactors, this is now done. No other way. Why are asked only to Medvedev? There is a new patriarch, activities not refuse to talk with his flock in public through the media. Eats the portal site. What can now be subscribed to? From what means? The Apostle Paul said: "You can not talk about religion with hungry .."

[Маруся]

Actually, the theme was very sad, but on the other hand, is very indicative:

We are in Moscow, for example, were missing a great many monuments, if it were not popular subscription. Can anybody imagine a monument to Pushkin Square without Opekushin? - But he, gentlemen, by subscription, from the ruble to accept contributions ...
Well as monuments Gogol, Dostoevskmu, Ostrovsky ...

With regard to the restoration of what is already there (for 30 - 40 - 50%) - both the famous "Last Supper" began to collapse even when the Da Vinci did not complete it, and he also became its first restorer. How much over the past century, people made their own hands to this work - is unknown. We know only one thing - many future generations will thank those unsung artists for what it is.

I was lucky, I saw the frescoes Rublev. In Zvenigorod, they are especially good! A new generation, it seems, will know the name of Andrei Rublev by Tarkovsky's films ... If all this movie will look.

And find oligarch who would have decided all the problems ... I guess for someone to exit.

Only if you do not make investments in culture in general and our unique artistic heritage in particular - that anyone who needs an investment in private collections? Well, just a generation for whom the heirs but they will be of interest? Money will come and those quickly from circulation (I mean popular topics about the dollar and euro)

Correct the subject could only holiday: All of the all-Russia men's day! All the best!

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Maroussia

Can anybody imagine a monument to Pushkin Square without Opekushin?!

Sorry, but this area previously had a somewhat different view.
Originally Pushkin monument was set at the beginning of Tverskaya Boulevard in the Holy Square (now Pushkin). In 1950, he was moved to the opposite side of the square, where he remains to this day.
And do not forget the wretchedness that is now a monument stands on the site of the Passion Monastery, which was in 1937 (during the reconstruction of Gorky Street (now Tverskaya Street) and the Pushkin Square) destroyed.
So, in the context of the topic, your example of "Pushkin Square without a monument Opekushin" is ambiguous. No?

[Маруся]

COP of the fact that the monument rearranged, with one side of the square to another, he has not ceased to be a monument of the AM Opekushin established in Moscow, June 6, 1880 and created the subscription, not only the inhabitants of Moscow, but Russia and the citizens of the Empire.
To subject such details are not relevant. And your opinion on the merits you have expressed.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

I'm remembering this monument to Pushkin, do not remember people's subscription to its installation, and what is now the monument stands on the spot razruschennogo monastery. About which he wrote.

[Маруся]

Well remembered to this subject in Moscow, where there are no more "...
Or is the argument that you can spit on the frescoes in the temple on the hill in Zvenigorod? Or just to say something ... I recall your opinion on the topic you have raised and it is all clear.