|
|||||||
| English | Русский | ![]() |
Регистрация | Дневники | Справка | Пользователи | Поиск | Сообщения за день | Все разделы прочитаны |
| Chatter General discussion. |
|
|
Опции темы | Опции просмотра |
|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #14 |
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,448 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23529
|
I think that the article is not customized. Just genre. There is an axiom: the good news does not sell, complacently article readers are not interested, you all blame and no one to praise. In other words, the audience "Programs and maximum" will always be higher than the channel "Culture". It's not that good or bad. Just because life is arranged in a specific historical juncture. Criticism is always interesting to praise.
Ordered price article should be in someone's interests. Moreover, the hint should be "transparent". Here, believe me, do not. I assure you that to build a logical chain between the problem of forgeries (criticizing antique market) and an appeal to buy contemporary art as free from fakes readers "news" is not built. On this "greed" is known only to professional players art market, which articles are not proshibesh. And the fact that people post articles, become more sensitive to security issues - what's wrong with that? Liability dealers have nothing to fear. On the contrary, someone's reputation above, and in the black, is not it? |
|
|
|
| Эти 5 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Vladimir за это полезное сообщение: | iosif (01.11.2008), LCR (01.11.2008), Sandro (03.11.2008), uriart (01.11.2008), Кирилл Сызранский (01.11.2008) |