Henry Campendonk (1889-1957)

[LCR]

Сообщение от Seriy

difference, IMHO, is small. Again, as with Mac, a palette of Vasily Kandinsky. This Vasily they picked, or they have it? or was somebody else, who they picked? Or there was an agreement, once the Blue Rider, all write in one, approved palette?
in that they are all their own way, have come to absolutely the same palette, I do not believe ...
a great artist! Thank you very much ..

Generally, if you look at the different factions beginning of the twentieth century, you will see that members of their very similar palette - whether it divizionnisty (all Signac, Cross and other van Risselberge) Fauvism (Derain, Vlaminck and Matisse, even 1906 times by color simply indistinguishable) or the Cubists with their typical rather dull gray-brown color. A Russian sezannizm? simply scream - black, green and brown again)! Hence, our riders are no exception
But Kandinsky in color, in my opinion, just different.

It's not only in the palette. These hodozhniki very different in spirit and mood. Personally, I am very sensitive to the amiable and dreamy contemplation Mac, to a romantic rebelliousness Nolde, the pathos of pantheism Mark. Campendonk attracts me less, but you, of course, quite right, he's a great artist.

Below - a short visual confirmation of what I say above

Three Fauvist and three Cubist.

Вложение 628551Вложение 628561Вложение 628571

Вложение 628581Вложение 628591Вложение 628601

I do not understand why when you preview all right, that is, as I wanted the picture are three in number, and the final version of all the spoils?

Admins, to cyber-pen, tell me what am I doing wrong?