What distinguishes the true artist from not present?

[Posav]

It is a pity that this forum can not provide quotes from a long message. Caravaggio is a religious art. The USSR was an ideological art of the ruling regime. Today's ruling also zhaluyut certain direction and the other is called not true.
For me, all the same criterion is "kitsch is kitsch or not, well, an element of corruption, pandering always stuck with kitsch.

[AlexanderG]

Сообщение от Posav

It is a pity that this forum can not provide quotes from a long message. Caravaggio is a religious art. The USSR was an ideological art of the ruling regime. Today's ruling also zhaluyut certain direction and the other is called not true.

Religioznoe, ili ideologicheskoe, ili sotsialisticheskoe, ili kapitalisticheskoe raznitsy ze net nikakoi, pravilno?
Prosto v to vremia byla drugaia ideologiia i hudozniki rabotali v etom napravlenii.

[iside]

Сообщение от Posav

For me, all the same criterion is "kitsch is kitsch or not"

Yes, I think many of the artists present at this forum adhere to this formula, I'm good - and you're bad "

[L-ana64110]

Сообщение от iside

Yes, I think many of the artists present at this forum adhere to this formula, I'm good - but you are bad "

Here it is very erroneous opinion, for the serious artist does not define good or bad, in fact criticized, sometimes harshly, but with the intent to help a colleague if the level of course approximately equal to, if the artist is a beginner-to delicately,,, well this is a delicate matter and a very individually.
Moreover, determining who is present or not in force and dreaming, Gal, and dealers simply buyers and collectors are very different,,,
and in general the question is not professional,,
reminiscent of the Nazis with their definitions of pure Aryan nation,,,
humiliating it all,,, allocate people into categories,,,

[iside]

Сообщение от L-ana64110

for the serious artist does not define good or bad

Well, how to understand what the artist is serious and what not?

In the end, all turns out well - subjectively.

[AlexanderG]

I snova vopros, a tak li uz nepredvziaty art kritiki, iskusstvovedy, istoriki?

Ved 'oni toze liudi, i prosto vyskazyvaiut svoio mnenie.

To est 'opiat' k nachalu - mnenie vs mnenie.

[artcol]

Сообщение от AlexanderG

I snova vopros, a tak li uz nepredvziaty art kritiki, iskusstvovedy, istoriki?

Spoken word - is a lie

Сообщение от AlexanderG

Ved 'oni toze liudi, i prosto vyskazyvaiut svoio mnenie.

Yes, they are people, but they are professionals. This is another hypostasis rights.

[AlexanderG]

Сообщение от artcol

Yes, they are people, but they are professionals. This is another hypostasis rights.

Professionaly ili net, no kak sporit 'o vkusah?

Vopros ne prostoi. Mozno govorit 'o znachimosti i pr, no esli cheloveku eto prosto ne nravitsia?

[artcol]

Сообщение от AlexanderG

Professionaly ili net, no kak sporit 'o vkusah?

Vopros ne prostoi. Mozno govorit 'o znachimosti i pr, no esli cheloveku eto prosto ne nravitsia?

Well, they taste like apriri the public, and pro armed with more advanced verbal and analytical apparatus.
If you do not like - justifies the pros, and it will be criticized. And as you know, public criticism is always a plus (the laws of PR - the main thing to say). And from this criticism can be repelled, at least to think people will be able to something, and read between the lines.

Shl There probably rather talk about beliefs, personal relationships and komm.interese.

[kozhinart]

Сообщение от iside

Yes, I think many of the artists present at this forum adhere to this formula, I'm good - but you are bad "

This is not peculiar to artists, and some lyudyam.A many creative people are hypertrophied ... Though there are very friendly people and artists, and is not dependent on the kind of deyatelnosti.Libo there, either, no .