Traders?

[Fed]

Сообщение от LCR

The report from the Fed --
I do not understand the subject matter of the two sides. If the trader bought the work because of how much he sold it did not matter the artist.
LCR-not true now - dealing with: the sale to the merchant must pay the artist the right to succeed.

    Nevertheless, the resale value of work did not cause the artist. Yes, and droit de force is not everywhere.

Сообщение от LCR

gallery owner has no right "to violate the percentage mark-up on the work undertaken to implement. Romario rights, final prices should be monitored.

 Who will supervise them in reality at the time of sale? Although this is not right to change the%, but if the job appears to hang because of this, and sold, then the hypothetical pritenzii look a bit fantastic.

Сообщение от LCR

What is the receipt? And what do you with a receipt that going to do? Wake up, Fed!

  Rogues have always been. To do this, and take a receipt. But this is a topic about rogues, and gallery owners here asked why they are called artists (disliked), dealers, gallery owners and do not call them dauber.
  Pritenzy, I actually can not be. Unless of course one another something is not pulled, but it is a mutual problem.