|
|||||||
| English | Русский | ![]() |
Регистрация | Дневники | Справка | Пользователи | Поиск | Сообщения за день | Все разделы прочитаны |
| Chatter General discussion. |
|
|
Опции темы | Опции просмотра |
|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #12 |
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 15.09.2009
Адрес: Киев
Сообщений: 3,066
Спасибо: 385
Поблагодарили 3,134 раз(а) в 1,448 сообщениях
Репутация: 6243
|
I do not understand the subject matter of the two sides. If the trader bought the work because of how much he sold it did not matter the artist. If taken to implement, it must issue a receipt for the capture and percent markups. If someone did not take it, he (sorry, but the word hick can not think of anything). If you broke the percentage mark-ups and sold, it is also fortunate merchant, but did not cause the artist, who for the sum agreed.
The only problem-%overestimated the time, but work is not for sale. But this system is likely to deceive themselves, and do not see a major goal in this sophisticated. Ie I understand that the main problem - forgot to take a receipt? |
|
|
|