Well QUITE forgery! For QUITE Starter

[Zenia]

She met last week with a group of Russian-speaking representatives of the company Roland (wide-format printers). One of them, Paul, left me a link to their publications.

http://www.peredelka.tv/digest/index_618_1.html

Opened the subject separately from the fakes, because there is talk about fakes already very arrogant.

[Евгений]

Zenia, is useful information.

[Самвел]

I work in the gallery, and the newly arrived artist by the name of Obukhov, such as the fact that he is known, perhaps he considers himself to Picasso, and no longer paints, and makes the posters on the canvas, and then a few strokes, and an expensive plastic frame. although he wrote back that the author's copy on the canvas. Sales are from 20-50 thousand. To my surprise, they sold poorly.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 1 minute[/color]
We certainly warn the buyer that he buys a poster, but it does not stop them.

[Евгений]

Samvel, is one-hundred-pood consumer goods, we know, there are the initials of the artist?

[Самвел]

I only checked that Yandex is Yuri Obukhov, artist, because of him napisano.chto really you would think that he is an artist.

[Евгений]

Originally Posted by Samvel

Yuri Obukhov,

Strangely, it is considered a good hudozhnikom.Esli all true, and respect among art dealers, he will lose at the moment.

[Самвел]

The fact that he is known as an artist with the name. Once a man came and asked, and who is the author, I say Obukhovka, and he told me in response to A Obukhov, it has a name. The honor of speaking I do not see anything in this author, but this is my personal opinion.

[Zenia]

Originally Posted by Samvel

true, he wrote back that the author's copy on the canvas.
[color="# 666686"]Added after 1 minute[/color]
We certainly warn the buyer that he buys a poster, but it does not stop them.

I wonder what the ordinary buyer understands: "editorial copy on the canvas" to understand something can be differently! For example you can think that this is a picturesque copy. Not correct to write: "print on canvas, although if he adds his touches, then it is mixed media. But agree: "author's copy" or "print on canvas or" a little bit different things, and can be interpreted in different ways.

[artcol]

Originally Posted by Samvel

The fact that he is known as an artist with the name. Once a man came and asked, and who is the author, I say Obukhovka, and he told me in response to A Obukhov, it has a name. The honor of speaking I do not see anything in this author, but this is my personal opinion.

For many years the seats in CHA probably give a good result.
Who's on the promotion of effective strategies for asking?

[sss]

Originally Posted by Eugene

It is one hundred pood consumer goods

Yes, Eugene, Stopudoviy consumer goods, only that he is not look, do not take the Van Gogh, and the works of contemporary authors. A similar nonsense used by many artists - publish their work, on top of prescribed hull paint, repeating the motion smear (the effect of a living writing) miscall not reproductions, and author's copy and handed in showrooms for traveling expenses. Print quality can believe in the originality of the man in the street picture.

And in general, with modern prints need to be careful. Color of the reprint of watercolor paper, preserving the natural matte surface, so that to distinguish from the original can only be physically torn paper.

Through three-dimensional scanning of modern technology allow you to print "oil painting" on canvas embossed paint, really play even krokelyurnuyu grid. The reverse side of the canvas (the traces of time, stains, etc.), as reprinted, with a hundred-percent hit in modularity weave cloth base. While this is fun is expensive, but I think it is a matter of time ... With such "designer replicas" fly may not only inhabitant.