Job A. Exter?

[Alenka]

Сообщение от redbor

So who can definitely attribution of A. Exter?
Why Kovalenko, always regarded as the main expert on Exter, fell under suspicion? In my opinion, absolutely nothing. This intrigues.
I have, they podisannaya attribution Exter. Do not pass?
Must carry on a new one? To where?
In the State Tretyakov Gallery, Waqar and Mihnenko yet listed?

In this case, at Exeter in general very similar, plus sizes, and, as I said before, I'm not haunted by the question "Why do the costume sketch of this size but also in oil on canvas ???", and expertise Kovalenko only just adds fuel to the fire. Somewhere on this forum has been lecturing about the authenticity of examinations Kovalenko and just noticed it was true that the examination of recent years caused rumors. So if your expertise "with the term of limitation " then, I suppose, and not to worry. Otherwise, better perebdet than nedobdet .....

[redbor]

Сообщение от Alenka

Somewhere on this forum has been lecturing about the authenticity of examinations Kovalenko and just noticed it was true that the examination of recent years caused rumors

All the same it is not clear that such rumors?
  Expertise G. Konovalenko been refuted by the results of other examinations?
Or simply someone vyskazyvat offense?
My expertise GA Konovalenko is, sure - is correct.
 But for other works Exter (I think)
 Who better to ask, so that no misunderstanding?

I do not give rest to the question "Why do the costume sketch of this size but also oil on canvas ???"

But it is much more absurd, to make a fake costume sketches "of this size but also oil on canvas "

[redbor]

And it - oil on canvas, size 1metr at 0,7 m, the work of Exter?

[eva777]

Сообщение от redbor

I have expertise GA Konovalenko there, sure - correct.

Kovalenko, or Konovalenko?

Added after 5 minutes

Сообщение от redbor

So who can definitely attribution of A. Exter?
Why Kovalenko, always regarded as the main expert on Exter, fell under suspicion? In my opinion, absolutely nothing. This intrigues.
I have, they podisannaya attribution Exter. Do not pass?
Must carry on a new one? To where?
In the State Tretyakov Gallery, Waqar and Mihnenko yet listed?

listed as Kovalenko!

[redbor]

Kovalenko, or Konovalenko?

Of course, Kovalenko. I think that he is the best specialist in Exter. It is not clear that the "rumors" that are constantly referred to?
His expertise had been refuted by other experts?

[Sandro]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

If I remember correctly, this picture is in the catalog Shovelena

That picture in the directory "Alexandra Exter, ed. Shovlena (red) is published on p. 167 (repr. 145) and dated 1920-21 gg., The same size, specified "Private Collection, Paris."

Added after 13 minutes

Сообщение от redbor

And this is - oil on canvas, size 1metr at 0,7 m, the work of Exter?

The work of the Leonard Hutton Gallery, New York, called the "Venice. The boat and the house", x /m, 1926., 106,7 h73, 6. Published ibid., p. 272, ill. 257.

Added after 20 minutes

Сообщение от redbor

Here, it is alleged that Alex Exter draw

IMHO - not she.
 Plus - what have musketeers?? Which is a show or in explanation of the play?? At this time, 1920-21 GG Exter worked on the production of "Romeo and Juliet, even specially went to Verona, studied the costumes of the era and the country, which nothing to do with the costumes of the Musketeers have.

[Сима]

redbor, the question - who was adopted? Before you answer I want to communicate the following: A Spaniard - charred on the right. It can burn, like all the sketches relating to the Chamber Theater in GTSTM them Bakhrushina during a fire in 1950 (or later, do not remember exactly). There were they there in 1949 after the closure of Kam. theater in full Museum Kamernoego theater. All of these things (of course, and all other artists, a slave. In the theater) are on the back of stamps Museum Kam. theater and his inv. numbers. Spaniard in the Chamber Theater has no relevance. May be related to a series of costumes for the Spanish dance, the three women's costumes from this series is in GTSTM came from instantly. muses. stock in 20-ies. and not burning. Thus Someone at the numerous directories with burnt Exter from GTSTM felt that "burn" - a sure sign of authenticity. Ie - It is a falsification.

[redbor]

Сообщение от Sandro

This picture in the directory "Alexandra Exter, ed. Shovlena (red) is published on p. 167 (repr. 145) ... The work of the Leonard Hutton Gallery, .. called the "Venice. The boat and the house", x /m, 1926., 106,7 h73, 6. Published ibid., p. 272, ill. 257.
....

The fact that directory compiled by the notorious Shovlenom can be ignored?
You can be sure that it works exactly A. Exter?
Although, that were exhibited Shoovlenom in Tours, in the exhibition closed with a scandal. Nakov said-there 90%of fakes?