53rd Venice Biennale. "Victory over the future. Tales of Italy

[LCR]

Сообщение от Vladimir

not the letter T. I?

No, in another letter

Сообщение от Vladimir

Tar, incidentally, also did not read very easily. Journalism - easier, but the texts where it is most trying - there is a dictionary. Judging by her book on Russian art of XX century. Signification thesis, structure, focus, number of illustrations - all super. But read the text itself - not everyone can handle the.

Tar is not so difficult to read, Groys, in my opinion, more difficult. But it's not that he /they are difficult to read, the fact that these art historians /critics are not quite see things and not interested in them - maybe that's why they prefer art that you can tell by mobile phone (I had already say that my art is not interested).

Note in the dialogue Tar /Tar Sviblovo position clear to me. It is strange that Sviblova not understand, when the Tar interprets her on curatorial projects

Tolstova - smart and subtle critic (which I also have somewhere said).
My trio - Kovalev, Alekseev, Tolstova - but I'm not looking at the criticism on a regular basis, could miss the interesting and important things.