Video art (X Media forum)

[Мунк]

Сообщение от fross

shaken, but until the dialogue I have to catch up and otsmotret even if you have already sampled (all I would have failed to achieve any of that. Thank you.

I am also not going to all osilivat. And so polegonku and gradually time permitting. In the autumn will be the 3rd Moscow Biennale Sovrem. Art Society - there should be a lot of video art.

[color="# 666686"]Posted 17 minutes later[/color]

Сообщение от gans

I am not skeptical, but there is a desire to understand one thing.
See, there is a "film" is absolutely recognized and respected art form, more than that is the "shorties", please explain why in the art should be "video art"? Maybe there is a theory of video art?

About the theory do not know. Incidentally, all three fellow-specialists (Razlogov, cones, Fundong) spoke on the differences and similarities of cinema and video art (see my first message here). More than they, I you can not explain. Fundong as an artist, ie media arts, says plainly what he needs video art).
A Shishko argues that video art - a kind of visual art, alternative cinema - first, the other effects on the audience, and secondly, more innovative (suit of high-tech). And if you're interested in my opinion, the video-art "must be followed, that art has the right to be at every turn: in both form and content, and technology. But other than movie effects of video art, I felt the "his cost" - I would do on TV looked just films video art, if they showed it - such an effect I like, and I usually turn off the TV sound (ie, mainstream does not interest me).