Oleksiy Konstantinov

[uriart]

Сообщение от nikola

And if the viewer does not see the beautiful in the abstract, I do not understand that his real-dazzle.

In reality how many times they see something real, that are accustomed to see in life.
And in the abstraction that you can see?
You can see and guess, but what the artist wanted to say? And so and left without an answer!
My opinion may be conservative, excuse me, this really is.
So in the first row of the more understandable than in the non-objective.
It also plays a form with color. This is beautiful, in my opinion.

In my opinion, if the artist paints such an abstraction, so he does not understand what it is and for what.
Rather paid tribute to the fashion-objective art.
A fashion is changeable!