And as you this news

[K-Maler]

M. Gelman since the beginning of the restructuring promotes the art of calling itself "relevant". This direction is opposed to traditional art. It promotes itself with the scandals, defined as "outrageous" ... If we talk about investments, profitability, etc., then the "art" quite the opposite - it does not make money but, in contrast, require permanent subsidies, sponsors, etc. ... These artists no one buys, but they want to live and all of their "participation in exhibitions" must be someone paid. Whom? Of the taxes of citizens? From the unselfish donations? ...