M. Gelman and Sochi

[Seriy]

manna, there is no good or gallery owner, is determined by a list of its artists, te of those with whom he works exclusively, and that only he can buy.
Gallery name or gallery owner in itself does not mean anything, it means a list that is behind the name and the list is usually in the range of ten names. Gelman might say, I will expose 150 artists and 150 other new exhibit. So?
 Political technologies is certainly a plus, but it is positive to the core, to art. And if artists are just suppliers of material for the next politaktsii conceived, it is a minus. Here was a bunch of shares and exhibitions at Perm-so what? where dry residue except blue instead klizmochek domes of Orthodox churches? This is all some techniques of the 1990s, make noise, little brother, make noise.
For other gallery owners I have nothing to say. If Russia is not on the world stage sovriska if in Basel zero after zero values ​​on many of the world fairs that you want to hear? that successful gallery owners we have, but hid?
This is the work of gallery owner-permanent participation at international auctions, the world's fairs. If gallerists no power even to a simple get-together, part of what they have power? If they close their gallery in Moscow and abroad, what you want to hear? Who is to blame that on them 2000000000 got nothing?