Old poster questionable subjects (interested in the time of creation).

[Борис Кон]

Arguments JohnDoe very reasonably ...
But!
Those samples that were German Poster presented to them, well, no it does not similar (in style) with the discussed instance.

There, feel each time.

[Ivan Petrov]

Cyril Syzran, naturally

the territory occupied by the German troops was 65 million people
all that was needed to manage the herd
why so much attention was given to public information

Rosenberg's office worked perfectly, for example from 5.2 million prisoners of war captured in 1941 , 2 million died , and the remaining 3.2 million ( estimated figures , but the order is correct ) 815 000 - that is, one out of four came up against a rotten scum from the Kremlin arms

all thanks to the competent information and advocacy

Added after 4 minutes
Cyril Syzran, do you really forgotten shovels profiles with unique issues - are you, your family and friends, the territories occupied by the German army in 1941-44?

Добавлено через 24 минуты
some more pictures of that time

[Ivan Petrov]

some more pictures of that time

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by Ivan Petrov

Cyril Syzran, of course

This is why the Germans, who in October 41 th stood in Moscow and her binoculars are risen , it was necessary to make posters about the Constitution of the USSR 36 years?
Sorry, but you could imagine a real bad situation in the occupied territories. There were villages where the entire occupation of the Germans living seen once and then passing on the road far from the village .
 >

Originally Posted by Ivan Petrov

Cyril Syzran, do you really forgotten shovels profiles with unique issues - are you , your family and friends, the territories occupied by the German army in 1941-44?

Me to remember the history of their country , do not remember " shovels profiles ".
My mother is from Smolensk - this time , and it is in war , near Munich, worked as Ostarbeiters , I know about the occupation and about the war enough, and not from books and the Internet , I and my father was at war, a war captain finished.

[bykinist]

treacherous enemy ...


http://www.tehnikapobedy.ru/posters.htm

[Allena]

Originally Posted by Boris Cohn ; 2399111"

not similar ( in style ) with the discussed instance.
It feels different time .

I agree. Even in brackets " style" to anything.
Conciseness main sends, I think, without hesitation points to the establishment . So, in 1924 or 1936 -th -th.
Hammer and sickle , as indicated by Wikipedia ( sorry : shy <! - ~ 1 ~ ->, was first addressed in the Constitution in 1924 ( there were , of course, in the past, but they are embodied in the Constitution in the context of our conversation - it is important ) and rags ideologically ( ie for the purpose of this poster ) would look right in the 1920s , but in 1936 is not the same .
Well, the style , in my opinion , is also not out of the thirties , and for 10 years early.

[Ivan Petrov]

Now ask the question Qui prodest?


Who could be addressed this poster in 1920?

[Allena]

Originally Posted by Ivan Petrov; 2399331"

who could have addressed this poster in 1920 ?

Support the assumption Cyril Syzran, that thing emigrant . The more I look - the thinner seems intent. In the mid-1920s , is still in flux was leaving , but also a considerable number of people were still strong desire to return to Russia (and it seemed possible that important). I think that it is addressed to the poster of the " restless intellectuals" - say , do not believe that there is life is getting better : adopted a constitution, and in fact ... and intelligent people there is no place, and Russian people there, too, no place, and most importantly, Russia is not. Allegedly , the Russian intelligentsia stood for relief of the workers and peasants, but no relief there . Ie No peasant and proletarian is addressed, in my opinion. By the way, if it was , for example, in 1936 the first year , then be sure there would be something on farms, and in 1924, for obvious reasons, this could not be.

[bykinist]

Originally Posted by Allena

not the peasant and proletarian is addressed

And is - in principle - this kind of propaganda generally calculated on the intelligentsia as a class?

I thought propaganda in nature appeals to the populist elements.

[Allena]

I answered the question, Qui prodest.
Let not the class, of course, and the "having eyes ...", and it is thinner, and therefore easy to understand.
What do you think, bykinist, what is it?

Added after 3 minutes

Originally Posted by bykinist

this kind of propaganda generally calculated on the intelligentsia as a class?

And to whom do we calculated all the anti-Soviet campaign in emigre circles?